Show Summary Details
Page of

Systematic reviews of occupational safety and health topics 

Systematic reviews of occupational safety and health topics
Chapter:
Systematic reviews of occupational safety and health topics
Author(s):

Jos Verbeek

and Sharea Ijaz

DOI:
10.1093/med/9780199683901.003.0014
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD MEDICINE ONLINE (www.oxfordmedicine.com). © Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Medicine Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 02 April 2020

This chapter aims to give an overview of the most pertinent items of research synthesis for both intervention studies and studies on causation. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of intervention studies are a well-established part of the transfer of research to practice. Even though historically debated, this also holds for systematic reviews of aetiological studies. The Cochrane Collaboration has elaborated methods for intervention reviews. The systematic approach entails building a well-structured question, a comprehensive search, using appropriate synthesis methods, and assessing risk of bias in the included studies. Examples and methods for these elements are given in this chapter. The general approach is similar for both intervention and aetiological reviews but the synthesis of study results and the risk of bias assessment differs.

Access to the complete content on Oxford Medicine Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.