Disclaimer

Oxford University Press makes no representation, express or implied, that the drug dosages in this book are correct. Readers must therefore always check the product information and clinical procedures with the most up to date published product information and data sheets provided by the manufacturers and the most recent codes of conduct and safety regulations. The authors and the publishers do not accept responsibility or legal liability for any errors in the text or for the misuse or misapplication of material in this work. Except where otherwise stated, drug dosages and recommendations are for the non-pregnant adult who is not breastfeeding.

Show Summary Details
Page of

Epidemiology and molecular foundation 

Epidemiology and molecular foundation
Chapter:
Epidemiology and molecular foundation
Author(s):

Dr Fu Siong Ng

and Nicholas Peters

DOI:
10.1093/med/9780199594764.003.0008
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD MEDICINE ONLINE (www.oxfordmedicine.com). © Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Medicine Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 25 October 2020

Selecting a short list of landmark basic science and epidemiology papers in the field of cardiac electrophysiology for this chapter has been no easy task. For every paper listed in the following section, we have had to leave out several other equally important, high-impact papers. To help narrow down the list, we have had to come up with a restrictive definition of what makes a landmark paper.

Here we describe basic science and epidemiology papers that are not only of high impact in terms of introducing novel concepts and opening up new fields of research, but these are papers that also have clear clinical implications that a reader can relate to. These clinical implications include the introduction of novel therapeutic agents or targets, the introduction of new diagnostic tools, or the changing of clinical practice in terms of the way we view, approach, and manage a particular disease.

As a result of these strict definitions, we have had to leave out many key papers that have introduced important electrophysiological concepts. These include the work of Antzelevitch and colleagues in investigating the transmural differences in electrophysiological properties between epicardial and endocardial cells and the discovery of M cells, and the work of Kleber and colleagues on the novel concept of source-sink mismatch, to name but a few.

In order to ensure that we present a good spread of papers that cover a wide range of electrophysiogical concepts and clinical arrhythmias, we have selected a single landmark paper for each of the subcategories listed below, so that these landmark papers cover a range of clinical entities such as atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, and inherited arrhythmia syndromes, different arrhythmia determinants, such as ionic currents, gap junctional coupling, and intracellular calcium, as well as important epidemiological studies.

Access to the complete content on Oxford Medicine Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.