Show Summary Details
Page of

Imaging in spinal trauma 

Imaging in spinal trauma
Chapter:
Imaging in spinal trauma
Author(s):

P. McNee

, S. Gaba

, and E. McNally

DOI:
10.1093/med/9780199550647.003.012037
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD MEDICINE ONLINE (www.oxfordmedicine.com). © Oxford University Press, 2016. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Medicine Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 17 November 2019

Clinical criteria and the nature of the injury determine who needs imaging

Plain films are still commonly employed though CT finds more fractures

Alignment, bony contour, cartilage (Disc and facets) and soft tissue are assessed in turn (ABC’S)

CT is superior to MRI in assessing the bony configuration of fracture

MRI is superior to CT in assessing the ligament tears and associated disc herniations

Plain films have little role in the assessment of more chronic back pain and radiculopathy

Sacral insufficiency fractures may be misdiagnosed as metastases on MRI.

Access to the complete content on Oxford Medicine Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.