Show Summary Details
Page of

Requests for Nonbeneficial Treatment 

Requests for Nonbeneficial Treatment
Chapter:
Requests for Nonbeneficial Treatment
Author(s):

Robert C. Macauley

DOI:
10.1093/med/9780199313945.003.0014
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD MEDICINE ONLINE (www.oxfordmedicine.com). © Oxford University Press, 2016. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Medicine Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 24 August 2019

The 1990s were termed the “futility decade” because of greater interest in cases where the patient demands treatment that the physician is reluctant to provide. In many ways this was the converse of the “right to die” movement of the 1970s and 1980s, except it did not lead to resolution because of definitional and practical barriers. The concept of nonbeneficial treatment—a more acceptable term—has recently received additional attention in the context of soaring health care costs. Some states have proposed clear and definitive mechanisms for adjudicating such disputes (such as the Texas Advance Directives Act). Each institution should have its own policy that can be modeled after a recent consensus statement on the topic.

Access to the complete content on Oxford Medicine Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.