Show Summary Details
Page of

International public health instruments 

International public health instruments
Chapter:
International public health instruments
Author(s):

Douglas Bettcher

, Katherine DeLand

, Jorgen Schlundt

, Fernando González-Martín

, Jennifer Bishop

, Summer Hamide

, and Annette Lin

DOI:
10.1093/med/9780199218707.003.0021
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD MEDICINE ONLINE (www.oxfordmedicine.com). © Oxford University Press, 2016. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Medicine Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 08 December 2019

Norms, standards, agreements, and regulations have been used, since the nineteenth-century International Sanitary Conferences, as governance tools in public health diplomacy. With globalization attaining an unprecedented level at the end of the twentieth century, it appeared that some public goods were increasingly difficult to provide efficiently at the state level. The reason for this is that as states increased their interconnectedness, the interrelation between domestic public goods common to the interacting states also increased. Correlatively, the singular nature of some of what were once solely domestic public goods progressively declined and the creation and maintenance of those public goods became shared enterprises. This led to the emergence of the concept of the global public good (GPG). This chapter examines the ideas of health as a GPG and international law in general, and international health instruments in particular, as intermediate GPGs utilized to protect and promote health. As intermediate GPGs for health, international legal instruments take on an additional layer of importance in global health governance. In providing a robust framework for improving and occasionally even creating health, these instruments are important not only for what they are already doing, but for the potential new instruments that may be developed. Through the presentation of case studies examining three international instruments that the World Health Organization (WHO) has been involved in developing, the chapter focuses on the evolution and implemen tation of emerging, salient international health-specific legal agreements. As WHO continues to grow into its normative role, it is likely that additional opportunities to exercise its constitutional quasi-legislative powers will present themselves. The three examples of intermediate GPGs examined in this chapter have laid a solid foundation on which WHO and its Member States may build, to continue working toward achieving the GPG of health.

Access to the complete content on Oxford Medicine Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.