Show Summary Details
Page of

A definition, modern classification, and global epidemiology of primary glomerulonephritis 

A definition, modern classification, and global epidemiology of primary glomerulonephritis
A definition, modern classification, and global epidemiology of primary glomerulonephritis

Claudio Ponticelli

and Richard J Glassock

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD MEDICINE ONLINE ( © Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Medicine Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 25 November 2020


The term glomerulonephritis (GN) nominally indicates an inflammation of glomeruli. Not all the glomerular diseases necessarily show an inflammatory component at histologic examination. Accordingly, some investigators feel correct to limit the term GN only to those glomerular diseases that show signs of inflammation (Sethi et al., 2016). On the other hand, primary GN diseases are caused by disorders of the adaptive immunity triggered by the activation of the innate immunity with consequent production of an inflammatory microenvironment. This may legitimate using the term GN to indicate all the diseases that mainly affect the glomeruli of both kidneys. Although the terms GN and glomerulopathy are interchangeable, GN is frequently used more from a traditional and historical perspective, rather than for accuracy.

Classification of glomerular diseases

Many different criteria exist for classifying the glomerular diseases, including those within the broad term of GN. Many classifications have been based on clinical features at presentation. At the beginning of the twentieth century, Friedrich Müller (1906) proposed the term nephrosis to define those kidney diseases characterized by degenerative lesions without any sign of inflammation. In 1914, Franz Volhard and Theodor Fahr introduced a novel classification of renal diseases based on differentiation between degenerative (nephroses), inflammatory (nephritides), and arteriosclerotic (scleroses) diseases. In 1947, Henry Christian of Boston first used the adjectival form of nephrosis—nephrotic syndrome (see Glassock et al., 2015). About ten years later, Berman and Schreiner (1958) and Derow (1958) proposed that the term nephrotic syndrome be used to indicate a condition characterized by marked proteinuria ≥3.5 g/24-hours associated with hypoalbuminaemia, and variable degrees of hyperlipidaemia and peripheral oedema. In contrast, the term nephritic syndrome was first used to indicate symptoms and signs that can be associated with inflammation of glomeruli, such as macroscopic or microscopic haematuria, often also associated with variable degree of proteinuria, hypertension and renal function deterioration (Wilson et al., 1947). Thus, according to the presence of either of these two syndromes a clinical classification of glomerular diseases can be based on nephrotic syndrome or nephritic syndrome. However, both syndromes may be concomitant (nephrosis-nephritis) in some instances and in other cases the initial symptoms and signs reliably predict the nature of the underlying glomerular damage.

Another classification of GN was based on the time of appearance and duration of the disease, i.e. acute, subacute or malignant, and chronic GN (Reubi, 1955). However, this classification was also affected by many biases and often led to misunderstanding between clinicians and pathologists (Mihatsch, 1979). Most current students of GN classification agree that the glomerular diseases should be differentiated into primary (the disease is caused by factors intrinsic to the kidney, and which are often unknown or idiopathic) and secondary (the glomerular disease is associated with systemic diseases such as diabetes mellitus or amyloidosis). Accordingly, a classification of glomerular diseases should take into account the possible aetiology and the diseases should be subdivided into primary or secondary forms. A clinical classification of GN can be also based on five major clinical syndromes: acute GN, rapidly progressive GN, chronic GN, the nephrotic syndrome, and asymptomatic urinary abnormalities (Glassock et al., 1991).

In 1946, Bell proposed the term membranous glomerulonephritis to describe a new category of glomerular disease. A few years later, kidney biopsy was introduced into clinical practice (Iverson and Brun, 1951; Kark and Muehrcke, 1954). This technique allowed to better elucidate the spectrum of morphologic types of glomerular lesions and their severity. In 1957, David Jones fully illustrated the special features of membranous nephropathy and demonstrated that they were not shared by other renal lesions. Pathologists also demonstrated that the so-called lipoid nephrosis in children was associated with minimal glomerular lesions at optical microscopy and by effacement of podocyte foot processes on electron microscopy, without significant deposits of immunoglobulins or complement on immunofluorescence (Joekes et al., 1958; Folli et al., 1958; Caulfield, 1964). In 1957, Arnold Rich reported that, in a number of children, some glomerular tufts in the juxtaglomerular region may show capsular adhesion and segmental sclerosis. These features were confirmed by other investigators, who proposed to adopt the term focal segmental glomerulosclerosis to define this pathological lesion (Kark et al., 1958; Heptinstall and Joekes, 1959; White et al., 1970; Habib and Gubler, 1973; Cameron et al., 1973). Habib and Kleiknecht (1971) pointed out that the glomerular lesions may be ‘minimal’, indicating that the glomeruli are normal or slightly modified, ‘focal’, indicating that, by light microscopy, a limited number of glomeruli are affected, and the remaining are normal, or ‘diffuse’, indicating generalized glomerular involvement, although not uniform in the degree or type.

With the exception of nephrotic syndrome in children, which is usually subdivided into steroid-sensitive and steroid resistant forms on the basis of clinical response to glucocorticoids, the most frequently used contemporary classification of glomerular diseases is a pathological one, mainly based on the results of optical microscopy, supplemented by immunofluorescence and electron microscopy. The current classification takes into consideration primary and secondary glomerular diseases. Among primary glomerular diseases, the clinical–pathological classification considers minimal change disease (MCD), focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), membranous nephropathy (MN), membranoproliferative GN (MPGN), infection-related GN, immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN), and pauci-immune (renal limited) necrotizing and crescentic GN (KDIGO, 2012). However, recent advances in the knowledge of mechanisms responsible of GN impose the necessity to review and modify the current pathological classification. In some subtypes of primary GN in which the cause of GN has been identified the term idiopathic is no longer relevant as a modifier. For example, the term focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis refers to a phenotypic expression of different disorders that may have different pathogenesis, clinical outcome, and response to therapy. Primary FSGS is now considered as a podocytopathy characterized clinically by the presence of nephrotic syndrome in a patient with an FSGS lesion on light microscopy and widespread foot process effacement on electron microscopy. Thus, FSGS is a lesion, not a specific disease. Many genetic defects localized to the podocyte can be seen in children (Ranganathan, 2016) and adults (Gast et al., 2016) with FSGS. Exome capture has identified many new monogenic causes of familial FSGS. The presence of apoliprotein-L1 (APOL1) variants, related to the increased APOL1 gene expression (Heymann et al., 2017), in patients of African descent confers seventeenfold higher odds for FSGS and twenty-nine-fold higher odds for HIV-associated nephropathy (Kopp et al., 2011), suggesting the existence of a particular form of APOL1-related FSGS. The cases of FSGS lesions characterized by the absence of nephrotic syndrome and the presence of segmental foot process effacement by electron microscopy are generally secondary to adaptive haemodynamic changes, infection, or exposure to drugs and should be considered as secondary forms (Sethi et al., 2015). The discovery that in most patients MN is caused by circulating antibodies directed against specific epitopes of some podocyte proteins identifies the disorder as an autoimmune disease and renders the term idiopathic obsolete (Beck et al., 2009; Glassock, 2012; Tomas et al., 2014; Fresquet et al., 2015; Kao et al., 2015). Six different pathologic variants of IgAN have been identified that can help to integrate prognostic significance independent of the clinical data (Working Group of the International IgA Nephropathy Network and the Renal Pathology Society, 2009). Until recently, MPGN has been classified as type I, type II, and type III based upon electron microscopy findings. Type I is characterized by immune deposits in the mesangium and subendothelial space. Type II (also called dense deposit disease, or DDD) is characterized by dense ribbon-like deposits along the basement membranes of the glomeruli and tubules. Type III is characterized by subepithelial deposits in addition to mesangial and subendothelial deposits. However, this classification cannot differentiate between immune complex-mediated and complement-mediated MPGN, an entity characterized by overactivation of the alternative pathway of complement (Servais et al., 2007). Thus, Sethi and Fervenza (2011 and 2012) proposed a new classification based on immunofluorescence results for immunoglobulin and complement deposition. Accordingly, it is now recognized that MPGN is a histological ‘pattern of injury’ in the same league as FSGS, and not a specific disease. This pattern may be caused either by immune-complexes or by dysregulation of the complement alternative pathway (e.g. C3 glomerulopathy), or, rarely, by chronic relapsing endothelial injury in thrombotic microangiopathy, without deposits of complement or immunoglobulins. Immunoglobulin-dominant MPGN, which is associated with autoimmune diseases, chronic infections, or monoclonal gammopathies with or without cryoglobulins, is now considered as a secondary GN. Instead, the cases in which the sole or dominant immunoreactant in the renal tissue is C3 are classified as primary GN and are defined as C3 glomerulopathy. The morphological phenotypic aspects of C3 glomerulopathy may be either those of DDD, characterized by dense osmiophilic deposits, or those of C3 glomerulonephritis, which shows isolated deposits and a histologic aspect of type I MPGN (Sethi and Fervenza, 2012; Pickering et al., 2013; Cook and Pickering, 2015). Many cases of crescentic GN have been discovered to be ANCA-positive vasculitis with predominant involvement of the kidney (Berden et al., 2010; Quintana et al., 2014). Finally, a number of less frequent primary GN are usually neglected in the different classifications used.

On the basis of the current knowledge, an aetiopathogenetic classification has been proposed by Mayo Clinic/Renal Pathology Society (Sethi et al., 2016). Five classes have been recognized:

  1. 1. Immune-complex GN

  2. 2. Pauci-immune GN

  3. 3. Anti-glomerular basement membrane GN

  4. 4. Monoclonal immunoglobulin GN

  5. 5. C3 Glomerulopathy

This classification is etymologically correct since it considers only GN characterized by increased glomerular hypercellularity caused by proliferation of indigenous cells and/or leukocyte infiltration. However, it does not include a number of proliferative GN, e.g. pure mesangial proliferative GN, IgM GN, C4 GN, and nonproliferative glomerular diseases, e.g. MCD, FSGS, MN, that may be considered as podocytopathies, but that are usually classified as GN (KDIGO, 2012). On the other hand, most glomerular diseases, including the so-called podocytopathies, are considered to be immune-related diseases (Couser and Johnson, 2014). It is now accepted by immunologists that the immune response is initiated by the activation of innate immunity with production of an inflammatory micro-environment. Thus, from a pathogenetic point of view, the immune-mediated glomerular diseases, including those without signs of inflammation at optic microscopy, might be classified as GN. Finally, the Mayo Clinic/Renal Pathology Society does not separate primary GN, in which the immune attack is limited to the kidney (Box 1.1), from secondary GN, in which the glomerular disease may be associated with systemic autoimmune diseases, infection, malignancy, or may be triggered by exposure to drugs or toxins. In this book we maintain the standard pathologic classification of primary GN, but the term C3 glomerulopathy and idiopathic MPGN will be used instead of MPGN.

DDD = Dense Deposit Disease, GN = Glomerulonephritis

Epidemiology of primary glomerular diseases

Little is known about the worldwide epidemiology of primary glomerular diseases. A large source of information comes from McGrogan and colleagues (2011), who conducted a systematic review of studies published between 1980 and 2007. The inclusion criteria were that the studies reported original work, that the study reported incidence of specific forms of glomerular disease with reference to a denominator population, that the estimates of population size and person-time contributed were accurate, and that efforts had been made to ascertain all incident cases. In most cases, primary GN was classified by renal biopsy. From their large analysis McGrogan and colleagues (2011) found that the reported incidence rates of primary GN in adults varied between 0.2 and 2.5/100,000/year, depending on the specific disease considered. More recently, in children, the annual incidence of GN has been steady at five to ten cases per 100,000 population, with the peak incidence ranging between one and eight years of age (Grenbaum, 2012). In a retrospective cohort study using two large US administrative datasets, Wetmore and colleagues (2016) found a prevalence of primary GN of 306/100,000 persons.

Among the primary glomerular diseases, minimal change disease (MCD) accounts for over 75 per cent of cases of nephrotic syndrome in children. According to McGrogan and colleagues (2011), the incidence rates in children were between 0.23/100,000/year and 15.6/100,000/year, being between 0.23–2.8/100,000/year in Caucasian children, 2.4/100,000/year in Hispanic children, 3.4/100,000/year in Afro-Caribbean children, 7.2–11.6/100,000/year in Arabian children, and 6.2–15.6/100,000/year in Asian children who resided in the UK. The exact prevalence is unknown, but it may be estimated at approximately ten to fifty cases per 100,000 children (Vivarelli et al., 2017). A systematic review on the epidemiology of histologically proven glomerular diseases in Africa between 1980 and 2014 reported that MCD was the most frequent primary GN accounting for 16.5 per cent (Okpechi et al., 2016). Another report showed that the incidence of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in Japanese children is approximately three to four times higher than that in Caucasians (Kikunaga et al., 2017). This illustrates the great importance of geography, ancestry, and environment in determining the epidemiologic features of GN. In adults, MCD accounts for 10–15 per cent of all primary nephrotic syndrome cases undergoing renal biopsy (Waldman et al., 2007). In adolescents the incidence of MCD is similar to that observed in adults (Hogg et al., 1993).

The incidence of FSGS in prospective or retrospective studies, was between 0.2/100,000/year and 1.1/100,000/year (McGrogan et al., 2011). An Australian retrospective review reported higher rates of 2.5/100,000/year in males and 1.8/100,000/year in females (Briganti et al., 2001). In New York, the frequency of FSGS increased from 19.3 per cent (1986–1991) and 16.6 per cent (1992–1997) to 58.5 per cent in the period from 2002 (Dragovic et al., 2005). Recent reviews from different countries also reported that FSGS was the most common cause of nephrotic syndrome (Polito et al., 2009; Woo et al., 2010; Alwahaibi et al., 2013; Golay et al., 2013; Chavez-Valencia et al., 2014; Jegateesan et al., 2016; Murugapandian et al., 2016). A survey of renal biopsies performed in the US in adults with primary glomerulopathies found that FSGS was the most common lesion (38.9 per cent) across all race and ethnic groups. The lesion of FSGS was much more frequently seen in African-Americans and patients with FSGS had the highest rate of poverty (Sim et al., 2016). In the analysis from the NEPTUNE study, FSGS was the most frequent cause of nephrotic syndrome (Gipson et al., 2016). Even in children in the last 30 years the incidence of FSGS increased by three- to fivefold (Srivastava et al., 1999; Filler et al., 2003). It should be noted, however, that in an undefined number of cases, FSGS was secondary to other diseases or pathologic conditions.

The incidence of membranous nephropathy in children and adolescents ranged between 0.02/100,000/year to 0.09/100,000/year (McGrogan et al., 2011); in adults, MN develops between 50 and 60 years of age, with 2:1 male predominance (Couser, 2017). The estimated incidence of MN in adults is around 1.2/100,000/year (McGrogan et al., 2011; Couser, 2017). Surveys in different countries reported that MN was the most frequent cause of nephrotic syndrome among primary GN (Polenakovic et al., 2003; Zhou et al., 2011; Ozturk et al., 2014), particularly in elderly subjects (Moutzoris et al., 2009; Yokoyama et al., 2012; Jin et al., 2014; Rollino et al., 2014; Maixnerova et al., 2015), while in other series it was the second cause of nephrotic syndrome after FSGS (Chavez-Valencia et al., 2014; Gipson et al., 2016; Sim et al., 2016; Jegateesan et al., 2016; Murugapandian et al., 2016). It is generally assumed that MN is more frequent in males but McGrogan and colleagues (2011) determined that there was insufficient information to conclude reliably whether there is a difference in risk between males and females.

IgA nephropathy often presents with asymptomatic microscopic haematuria and mild or absent proteinuria. The different policies used for renal biopsy in patients with isolated microscopic haematuria may render difficult to estimate the real incidence of IgA nephropathy. At any rate, studies in children based on renal biopsy estimated an incidence ranging between 0.31 to 0.57/100,000/year (Sehic et al., 1997; Coppo et al., 1998), while a Japanese study based on screening reported an incidence of 4.5/100,000/year (Utsunomya et al., 2003). In McGrogan and colleagues (2011), most of the studies in adults were prospective, reporting rates from 0.2/100,000/year to 2.8/100,000/year; the retrospective studies reported a similar range of rates, from 0.4/100,000/year to 2.9/100,000/year. Taken together the available results, IgAN seems to be the most common histological feature in Europe, Asia, and the US (Gesualdo et al., 2004; Nair et al., 2006; Hanko et al., 2009; Riispere et al., 2012; Zaza et al., 2013; Xie et al., 2013; Sugiyama et al., 2013, Floege and Amann, 2016). IgAN is rare in subjects of African ancestry.

Until few years ago, the diagnosis of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis was based on ultrastructural findings, namely interposition of the mesangium and a double contoured appearance of the glomerular basement membrane. As mentioned, today a histological appearance of MPGN associated with immunoglobulin deposits is generally secondary to infection or systemic diseases, while primary cases are generally associated with dysregulated activation of the alternative pathway of complement, hence the term C3 glomerulopathy. McGrogan and colleagues (2011) found that most cases defined as MPGN were actually secondary to acute post-infection glomerulonephritis or hepatitis B infection, making it difficult to evaluate the incidence of primary disease. According to the old classification, the general impression is that the incidence of this lesion among renal biopsies is decreasing in Western countries, while it seems to be increasing in the Danish and North-eastern Rumanian registries (Heaf et al., 1999; Volovat et al., 2013). However, the available data are deeply biased by the inclusion of cases associated with infection, cryoglobulinemia, or malignancy.

C3 glomerulopathy is often characterized by a membranoproliferative appearance at optical microscopy, with strong C3 deposition and without immunoglobulin deposits at immunofluorescence (Sethi and Fervenza, 2012). Within this histological pattern some cases are characterized by intramembranous DDD, which is more frequent and aggressive in younger subjects. The incidence of C3 glomerulopathy is quite low. A British study identified 80 cases, 21 with DDD and 59 with a MPGN pattern, with an incidence of around 0.1 per 100,000 population over the 17-year study duration in the Dublin and London areas (Medjeral-Thomas et al., 2014). In a smaller Indian study, C3 glomerulopathy accounted for 1 per cent of biopsy-proven primary GN, the most frequent histological pattern being that of MPGN (Mathur et al., 2015). Apart from C3 glomerulopathy, abnormal control of the complement alternative pathway can also result in atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome, as well as atypical postinfectious glomerulonephritis (Angioi et al., 2016).

The impact on renal survival of different subtypes of primary GN is discussed in the single chapters. A rough idea may be drawn by the data extracted from the US Renal Data System (USRDS) for adults, which considered six types of glomerular disease and vasculitis. Here we take into account only the four subtypes of primary glomerulonephritis reported in the USRDS study: FSGS, IgAN, MN, and MPGN. End stage renal disease (ESRD) attributed to diabetes and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease served as comparators. After a median follow-up of 2.5 years, the lowest crude mortality was seen in IgAN (3.7 deaths/100 person years). Compared to IgAN, adjusted mortality hazard ratio (HR) was higher in all other subtypes of glomerulonephritis (MN: HR 1.23; FSGS: HR 1.37; MPGN: HR 1.38) as well as in diabetes (HR 1.73), and in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (HR 1.2; O’Shaughnessy et al., 2015).

Finally, it is important to recognize that in spite of the precautions taken by different investigators to prevent biases, the available epidemiological data suffer from a number of relevant discrepancies, the more relevant biases being:

  1. i. the policy and indications for performance of kidney biopsy are quite variable, not only among countries, but also among practitioners and nephrologists in the same country;

  2. ii. there are large differences in socio-economic and hygienic conditions among countries and among the regions of the same country; and

  3. iii. there are differences in age, gender, and ethnicity in the available reports.

With these drawbacks in mind, it is reasonable to conclude that IgAN most likely represents the most frequent form of primary GN worldwide, except in equatorial Africa. Probably, its prevalence is even higher than generally estimated because many patients with isolated haematuria are not submitted to kidney biopsy. Minimal change disease is by far the most frequent cause of nephrotic syndrome in children and adolescents. However, its precise incidence and prevalence are difficult to evaluate, since most steroid-sensitive children do not receive kidney biopsy. FSGS and membranous nephropathy are the most frequent causes of nephrotic syndrome in adults, the former particularly in patients of African (West African) ancestry. However, it is possible that the relative impact of either of these two glomerular diseases may depend on the age and gender of patients. Indeed, it is likely that primary MN tends to be more frequent in the older adult. On the other hand, the higher the age of the patient, the less likely is his/her possibility of receiving a kidney biopsy, in spite of its documented usefulness in providing prognostic information and guiding therapeutic decisions (Bomback et al., 2012). Little information is available about the incidence of C3 glomerulopathy, since many diseases with the histological features of immunoglobulin deposits in the mesangium and basement membrane thickening have been wrongly classified among the label of MPGN. Finally, a number of rare primary glomerular diseases, e.g. collagenofibrotic glomerulopathy, thin basement membrane disease, IgM nephropathy, C1q nephropathy, etc., have never been considered in most of the available reports.


Alwahaibi NY, Alhabsi TA, Alrawahi SA. (2013). Pattern of glomerular diseases in Oman: A study based on light microscopy and immunofluorescence. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 24: 387–91.Find this resource:

Angioi A, Fervenza FC, Sethi S, et al. (2016). Diagnosis of complement alternative pathway disorders. Kidney Int. 89: 278–88.Find this resource:

Beck LH Jr, Bonegio RG, Lambeau G, et al. (2009). M-type phospholipase A2 receptor as target antigen in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 361: 11–21.Find this resource:

Bell, E.T. (1946). Glomerulonephritis. In Renal Diseases, pp. 141–253. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, PA.Find this resource:

Berden AE, Ferrario F, Hagen EC, et al. (2010). Histopathologic classification of ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 21: 1628–36.Find this resource:

Berman LB, Schreiner GE. (1958). Clinical and histologic spectrum of the nephrotic syndrome. Am J Med. 24: 249–67.Find this resource:

Bomback AS, Herlitz LC, Markowitz GS. (2012). Renal biopsy in the elderly and very elderly: Useful or not? Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 19: 61–7.Find this resource:

Briganti EM, Dowling J, Finlay M, et al. (2001). The incidence of biopsy-proven glomerulonephritis in Australia. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 16: 1364–7.Find this resource:

Cameron JS, Ogg CS, Turner DR, et al. (1973). Focal glomerulosclerosis. Perspect Nephrol Hypertens. 1: 249–61.Find this resource:

Caulfield JB. (1964). Application of the electron microscopy to renal diseases. N Engl J Med. 270: 183–94.Find this resource:

Chávez Valencia V, Orizaga de La Cruz C, Guillermo Becerra Fuentes J, et al. (2014). Epidemiology of glomerular disease in adults: A database review. Gac Med Mex. 150 (Suppl 2): 186–93.Find this resource:

Cook HT, Pickering MC. (2015). Histopathology of MPGN and C3 glomerulopathy. Nat Rev Nephrol. 11: 14–22.Find this resource:

Coppo R, Gianoglio B, Porcellini MG, et al. (1998). Frequency of renal diseases and clinical indications for renal biopsy in children (report of the Italian National Registry of Renal Biopsies in Children). Group of Renal Immunopathology of the Italian Society of Pediatric Nephrology and Group of Renal Immunopathology of the Italian Society of Nephrology. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 13: 293–7.Find this resource:

Couser WG. (2017). Primary membranous nephropathy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 12: 983–97.Find this resource:

Couser WG, Johnson RJ. (2014). The etiology of glomerulonephritis: Roles of infection and autoimmunity. Kidney Int. 86: 905–14.Find this resource:

Derow HA. (1958). The nephrotic syndrome. N Engl J Med. 258: 77–82.Find this resource:

Dragovic D, Rosenstock JL, Wahl SJ, et al. (2005). Increasing incidence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and an examination of demographic patterns. Clin Nephrol. 63: 1–7.Find this resource:

Filler G, Young E, Geier P, et al. (2003). Is there really an increase in non-minimal change nephrotic syndrome in children? Am J Kidney Dis. 42: 1107–13.Find this resource:

Floege J, Amann K. (2016). Primary glomerulonephritides. The Lancet. 387: 2036–48.Find this resource:

Folli G, Pollak VE, Reid RT, et al. (1958). Electron-microscopic studies of reversible glomerular lesions in the adult nephrotic syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 49: 775–95.Find this resource:

Fresquet M, Jowitt TA, Gummadova J, et al. (2015). Identification of a major epitope recognized by PLA2R autoantibodies in primary membranous nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2: 302–13.Find this resource:

Gast C, Pengelly RJ, Lyon M, et al. (2016). Collagen (COL4A) mutations are the most frequent mutations in adult focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 31: 961–70.Find this resource:

Gesualdo L, Di Palma AM, Morrone LF, et al. (2004). The Italian experience of the national registry of renal biopsies. Kidney Int. 66: 890–4.Find this resource:

Gipson DS, Troost JP, Lafayette RA, et al. (2016). Complete remission in the Nephrotic Syndrome Study Network. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 11: 81–9.Find this resource:

Glassock RJ. (2012). The pathogenesis of membranous nephropathy: evolution and revolution. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 21: 235–42.Find this resource:

Glassock RJ, Brenner BM. (1991). The major glomerulopathies. In JD Wilson, E Braunwald, KI Isselbacher, et al. (eds), Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine, 12th edition, pp. 1170–80. MacGraw-Hill, Inc. New York.Find this resource:

Glassock RJ, Fervenza F, Hebert L, Cameron JS. (2015). Nephrotic syndrome redux. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 20: 13–17.Find this resource:

Golay V, Trivedi M, Kurien AA, et al. (2013). Spectrum of nephrotic syndrome in adults: Clinicopathological study from a single center in India. Ren Fail. 35: 487–91.Find this resource:

Greenbaum LA, Benndorf R, Smoyer WE. (2012). Childhood nephrotic syndrome--current and future therapies. Nat Rev Nephrol. 8: 445–58.Find this resource:

Habib R, Gubler MC. (1973). Focal sclerosing glomerulonephritis. Perspect Nephrol Hypertens. 1: 263–78.Find this resource:

Habib R, Kleinknecht C. (1971). The primary nephrotic syndrome of childhood. Classification and clinicopathologic study of 406 cases. Pathol Annu. 6: 417–74.Find this resource:

Hanko JB, Mullan RN, O’Rourke DM, et al. (2009). The changing pattern of adult primary glomerular disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 24: 3050–4.Find this resource:

Heaf J, Løkkegaard H, Larsen S. (1999). The epidemiology and prognosis of glomerulonephritis in Denmark 1985–1997. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 14: 1889–97.Find this resource:

Heptinstall RH, Joekes AM. (1959). Renal biopsy. Proc R Soc Med. 52: 211–12.Find this resource:

Heymann J, Winkler CA, Hoek M, et al. (2017). Therapeutics for APOL1 nephropathies: Putting out the fire in the podocyte. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 32: i65–70.Find this resource:

Hogg RJ, Silva FG, Berry PL, et al. (1993). Glomerular lesions in adolescents with gross hematuria or the nephrotic syndrome. Report of the Southwest Pediatric Nephrology Study Group. Pediatr Nephrol. 7: 27–31.Find this resource:

Iverson P, Brun C. (1951). Aspiration biopsy of the kidney. Am J Med. 11: 324–30.Find this resource:

Jegatheesan D, Nath K, Reyaldeen R, et al. (2016). Epidemiology of biopsy-proven glomerulonephritis in Queensland adults. Nephrology (Carlton). 21: 28–34.Find this resource:

Jin B, Zeng C, Ge Y, et al. (2014). The spectrum of biopsy-proven kidney diseases in elderly Chinese patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 29: 2251–9.Find this resource:

Joekes AM, Heptinstall RH, Porter KA. (1958). The nephrotic syndrome: A study of renal biopsies in 20 adult patients. Q J Med. 27: 495–516.Find this resource:

Jones D. (1957). Nephrotic glomerulonephritis. Am J Pathol. 33: 313–29.Find this resource:

Kao L, Lam V, Waldman M, et al. (2015). Identification of the immunodominant epitope region in phospholipase A2 receptor-mediating autoantibody binding in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 26: 291–301.Find this resource:

Kark RM, Muehrcke RC. (1954). Biopsy of kidney in prone position. The Lancet. 266: 1047–9.Find this resource:

Kark RM, Pirani CL, Pollak VE, et al. (1958). The nephrotic syndrome in adults: A common disorder with many causes. Ann Intern Med. 49: 751–4.Find this resource:

KDIGO. (2012). Clinical practice guideline for glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int. 2S (2): 1–143.Find this resource:

Kikunaga K, Ishikura K, Terano C, et al. (2017). High incidence of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in East Asian children: A nationwide survey in Japan (JP-SHINE study). Clin Exp Nephrol. 21: 651–7.Find this resource:

Kopp JB, Nelson GW, Sampath K, et al. (2011). APOL1 genetic variants in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and HIV-associated nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 22: 2129–37.Find this resource:

Maixnerova D, Jancova E, Skibova J, et al. (2015). Nationwide biopsy survey of renal diseases in the Czech Republic during the years 1994-2011. J Nephrol. 28: 39–49.Find this resource:

Mathur M, Sharma S, Prasad D, et al. (2015). Incidence and profile of C3 Glomerulopathy: A single center study. Indian J Nephrol. 25: 8–11.Find this resource:

McGrogan A, Franssen CFM, de Vries CS. (2011). The incidence of primary glomerulonephritis worldwide: A systematic review of the literature. Nephrol Dial Trasplant. 26: 414–43.Find this resource:

Medjeral-Thomas NR, O’Shaughnessy MM, O’Regan JA, et al. (2014). C3 glomerulopathy: Clinicopathologic features and predictors of outcome. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 9: 46–53.Find this resource:

Mihatsch MJ. (1979). A modern classification of glomerulonephritis. A step forward for the pathologist. Path Res Pract. 164: 35–48.Find this resource:

Moutzouris D-A, Herlitz L, Appel GB, et al. (2009). Renal biopsy in the very elderly. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 4: 1073–82.Find this resource:

Müller F. (1906). Morbus brightii. Vehr Disch Pth Ges. 9: 64.Find this resource:

Murugapandian S, Mansour I, Hudeeb M, et al. (2016). Epidemiology of glomerular disease in southern Arizona: Review of 10-year renal biopsy data. Medicine (Baltimore). 95: e3633.Find this resource:

Nair R, Walker PD. (2006). Is IgA nephropathy the commonest primary glomerulopathy among young adults in the USA? Kidney Int. 69: 1455–8.Find this resource:

Okpechi IG, Ameh OI, Bello AK, et al. (2016). Epidemiology of histologically proven glomerulonephritis in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 11: e0152203.Find this resource:

O’Shaughnessy MM, Montez-Rath ME, Lafayette RA, et al. (2015). Patient characteristics and outcomes by GN subtype in ESRD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 10: 1170–8.Find this resource:

Ozturk S, Sumnu A, Seyahi N, et al. (2014). Demographic and clinical characteristics of primary glomerular diseases in Turkey. Int Urol Nephrol. 46: 2347–55.Find this resource:

Pickering MC, D’Agati VD, Nester CM, et al. (2013). C3 glomerulopathy: Consensus report. Kidney Int. 84: 1079–89.Find this resource:

Polenakovic MH, Grcevska L, Dzikova S. (2003). The incidence of biopsy-proven primary glomerulonephritis in the Republic of Macedonia-long-term follow-up. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 18 (Suppl 5): 26–7.Find this resource:

Polito MG, de Moura LA, Kirsztajn GM. (2009). An overview on frequency of renal biopsy diagnosis in Brazil: Clinical and pathological pattern based on 9617 native kidney biopsies. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 24: 3050–4.Find this resource:

Quintana LF, Peréz NS, De Sousa E, et al. (2014). ANCA serotype and histopathological classification for the prediction of renal outcome in ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 29: 1764–9.Find this resource:

Ranganathan S. (2016). Pathology of podocytopathies causing nephrotic syndrome in children. Front Pediatr. 4: 1–12.Find this resource:

Reubi F. (1955). Physiopathology and clinical manifestations of glomerulonephritis. J Urol Medicale Chir. 61: 626–60.Find this resource:

Rich AR. (1957). A hitherto undescribed vulnerability of the juxtamedullary glomeruli in lipoid nephrosis. Johns Hopk Hosp Bull. 100: 173–86.Find this resource:

Riispere Z, Ots-Rosenberg M. (2012). Occurrence of kidney diseases and patterns of glomerular disease based on a 10-year kidney biopsy material: A retrospective single-centre analysis in Estonia. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 46: 389–94.Find this resource:

Rollino C, Ferro M, Beltrame G, et al. (2014). Renal biopsy in patients over 75: 131 cases. Clin Nephrol. 82: 225–30.Find this resource:

Sehic AM, Gaber LW, Roy S III, et al. (1997). Increased recognition of IgA nephropathy in African-American children. Pediatr Nephrol. 11: 435–7.Find this resource:

Servais A, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Lequintrec M, et al. (2007). Primary glomerulonephritis with isolated C3 deposits: A new entity which shares common genetic risk factors with haemolytic uraemic syndrome. J Med Genet. 44: 193–9.Find this resource:

Sethi S, Fervenza FC. (2011). Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis: Pathogenetic heterogeneity and proposal for a new classification. Semin Nephrol. 31: 341–8.Find this resource:

Sethi S, Fervenza FC. (2012). Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis—a new look at an old entity. N Engl J Med. 366: 1119–31.Find this resource:

Sethi S, Glassock RJ, Fervenza FC. (2015). Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: towards a better understanding for the practicing nephrologist. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 30: 375–84.Find this resource:

Sethi S, Haas M, Markowitz GS, et al. (2016). Mayo Clinic/Renal Pathology Society Consensus Report on Pathologic Classification, Diagnosis, and Reporting of GN. J Am Soc Nephrol. 27: 1278–87.Find this resource:

Sim JJ, Batech M, Hever A, et al. (2016). Distribution of biopsy-proven presumed primary glomerulonephropathies in 2000-2011 among a racially and ethnically diverse US population. Am J Kidney Dis. 68: 533–44.Find this resource:

Srivastava T, Simon SD, Alon US. (1999). High incidence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in nephrotic syndrome of childhood. Pediatr Nephrol. 13: 13–18.Find this resource:

Sugiyama H, Yokoyama H, Sato H, et al. (2013). Japan Renal Biopsy Registry and Japan Kidney Disease Registry: Committee Report for 2009 and 2010. Clin Exp Nephrol. 17: 155–73.Find this resource:

Tomas NM, Beck LH Jr, Meyer-Schwesinger C, et al. (2014). Thrombospondin type-1 domain-containing 7A in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 371: 2277–87.Find this resource:

Utsunomiya Y, Koda T, Kado T, et al. (2003). Incidence of pediatric IgA nephropathy. Pediatr Nephrol. 18: 511–15.Find this resource:

Vivarelli M, Massella L, Ruggiero B, Emma F (2017). Minimal change disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 12: 332–45.Find this resource:

Volhard FT. (1914). Die Bright’sche Nierenkrankheit: Klinik, Pathologie und Atlas. Springer. Berlin.Find this resource:

Volovăt C, Cãruntu I, Costin C, et al. (2013). Changes in the histological spectrum of glomerular diseases in the past 16 years in the North-Eastern region of Romania. BMC Nephrol. 14: 148.Find this resource:

Waldman M, Crew RJ, Valeri A, et al. (2007). Adult minimal-change disease: Clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2: 445–53.Find this resource:

Wetmore JB, Guo H, Liu J, et al. (2016). The incidence, prevalence, and outcomes of glomerulonephritis derived from a large retrospective analysis. Kidney Int. 90: 853–60.Find this resource:

White RH, Glasgow EF, Mills RJ. (1970). Clinicopathological study of nephrotic syndrome in childhood. Lancet. 1: 1353–9.Find this resource:

Wilson HE, Saslaw S, Doan CA, et al. (1947). Reactions of monkeys to experimental mixed influenza and streptococcus infection. An analysis of the relative roles of humoral and cellular immunity, with the description of an intercurrent nephritic syndrome. J Exp Med. 85: 199–215.Find this resource:

Woo KT, Chan CM, Mooi CY, et al. (2010). The changing pattern of primary glomerulonephritis in Singapore and other countries over the past 3 decades. ClinNephrol. 74: 372–83.Find this resource:

Working Group of the International IgA Nephropathy Network and the Renal Pathology Society (2009). The Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy: Rationale, clinicopathological correlations, and classification. Kidney Int. 76: 534–45.Find this resource:

Working Group of the International IgA Nephropathy Network and the Renal Pathology Society (2009). The Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy: pathology definitions, correlations, and reproducibility. Kidney Int. 76: 546–56.Find this resource:

Xie J, Chen N. (2013). Primary glomerulonephritis in mainland China: An overview. Contrib Nephrol. 181: 1–11.Find this resource:

Yokoyama H, Sugiyama H, Sato H, et al. (2012). Renal disease in the elderly and the very elderly Japanese: Analysis of the Japan Renal Biopsy Registry (J-RBR). Clin Exp Nephrol. 16: 903–20.Find this resource:

Zaza G, Bernich P, Lupo A. (2013). Incidence of primary glomerulonephritis in a large North-Eastern Italian area: A 13-year renal biopsy study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 28: 367–72.Find this resource:

Zhou FD, Shen HY, Chen M, et al. (2011). The renal histopathological spectrum of patients with nephrotic syndrome: an analysis of 1523 patients in a single Chinese centre. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 26: 3993–7.Find this resource: