Show Summary Details
Page of

Key working versus the whole-team approach 

Key working versus the whole-team approach
Chapter:
Key working versus the whole-team approach
Author(s):

Tom Burns

, and Mike Firn

DOI:
10.1093/med/9780198754237.003.0005
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD MEDICINE ONLINE (www.oxfordmedicine.com). © Oxford University Press, 2016. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Medicine Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 19 August 2019

In ACT, it was originally proposed that every patient should be looked after by the whole team and not have an individual case manager or key worker. Its originator, Len Stein, was convinced that key working fostered pathological dependence, and the idea has gained considerable prominence. We reject this proposal and explore the practical differences between the whole-team approach and more usual forms of multidisciplinary care. There is clearly a range of practice that can be adapted for different teams depending on the specific needs of their group of patients.

Access to the complete content on Oxford Medicine Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.