Show Summary Details
Page of

Modes of Morals Made 

Modes of Morals Made
Chapter:
Modes of Morals Made
Author(s):

George Graham

DOI:
10.1093/med/9780198728658.003.0003
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD MEDICINE ONLINE (www.oxfordmedicine.com). © Oxford University Press, 2016. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Medicine Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 15 November 2019

The chapter defends two theses in ethics. One is that moral principles or norms are independent of divine commands. If there is a god who deserves to be called “God” and worshipped, that God would never command the killing of an innocent child. To believe otherwise is to misconceive the normative independence of ethics. The other thesis is that moral beliefs are not a type of empirical belief. As David Hume taught, moral judgments are not confirmed by empirical observations. “Is” fails to imply “morally ought.” The chapter argues that Abraham is a case of delusional misinterpretation of religious experience. Such cases pose a dilemma for psychiatry. The dilemma is dubbed The Abraham Dilemma. The dilemma concerns how to understand the connection between religious experience and its delusory misinterpretation.

Access to the complete content on Oxford Medicine Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.