Show Summary Details
Page of

Right to Refuse Treatment 

Right to Refuse Treatment
Chapter:
Right to Refuse Treatment
Author(s):

Rebecca Lewis

DOI:
10.1093/med/9780190914424.003.0010
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD MEDICINE ONLINE (www.oxfordmedicine.com). © Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Medicine Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 07 March 2021

Chapter 9 describes cases related to one of the most important autonomy issues involved in the involuntary hospitalization of individuals with mental illness - the right to refuse treatment. These cases highlight the different judicial opinions about how to manage patients who refuse treatment as exemplified by the contrast between a treatment-driven approach in Rennie v. Klein, to a right-driven approach in Rogers v. Commissioner. Other cases included in this chapter are Application of Presidents and Directors of Georgetown, Superintendent of Belchertown State School v. Saikowitz and In the Matter of the Guardianship of Richard Roe III.

Access to the complete content on Oxford Medicine Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.