Show Summary Details
Page of

Difficult Conversations: Evaluating the Medical Humanities 

Difficult Conversations: Evaluating the Medical Humanities
Chapter:
Difficult Conversations: Evaluating the Medical Humanities
Author(s):

Martina Kelly

DOI:
10.1093/med/9780190849900.003.0010
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD MEDICINE ONLINE (www.oxfordmedicine.com). © Oxford University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Medicine Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 01 March 2021

Evaluation of the medical humanities/health humanities is contentious. Medicine, steeped in a world of accountability, seeks evidence of effectiveness or impact, where evidence is confined to the measurable. Medical humanities, an eclectic interdisciplinary field, values the experiential, more suited to descriptive, qualitative forms of investigation. Rather than prize one approach over the other, clinician educators need to be methodologically flexible. The decision about which approach to use is best determined by the question(s) they wish to answer. This chapter briefly reviews some of the tensions medical educators face when deciding how to evaluate their teaching. It outlines a number of approaches to evaluation and gives examples from the medical humanities literature. Finally, it provides some resources to direct further inquiry.

Access to the complete content on Oxford Medicine Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.