Show Summary Details
Page of

Form and content in Jaspers’ psychopathology 

Form and content in Jaspers’ psychopathology

Chapter:
Form and content in Jaspers’ psychopathology
Author(s):

Chris Walker

DOI:
10.1093/med/9780199609253.003.0006
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD MEDICINE ONLINE (www.oxfordmedicine.com). © Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Medicine Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).

date: 30 May 2017

Jaspers drew the distinction of form and content from the Transcendental Analytic of Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason (1781, 1787). The form of an experience allows us to distinguish normal image from true hallucination from pseudohallucination, all of which experiences may have the same content. The form-content distinction applies to all psychopathological knowledge – not just to phenomenology. The distinction is explicit in Jaspers’ phenomenology and psychology of understandable connections, but only implicit in the psychology of objective performance and causal connections. Should we step beyond particular knowledge to psychic life as a whole – to nosology, eidology and biography – the form-content distinction no longer applies and we are in the realm of Kantian regulative ideas. Kant’s theory of knowledge and critique of metaphysics is absolutely central to Jaspers’ psychopathology.

Access to the complete content on Oxford Medicine Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.