Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The ESC Textbook of Intensive and Acute Cardiac Care$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Edited by Marco Tubaro, Nicolas Danchin, Gerasimos Filippatos, Patrick Goldstein, Pascal Vranckx, Doron Zahger

European Society of Cardiology Acute Cardiac Care ESC Working Group Acute Cardiovassular Care Associations

CME Assessment

Click here for more information and links to available questions.

Access token activation

Click here to activate your access token for this title.

References

All references in the book are available to download for free.

Subscriber Login

Forgotten your password?

Disclaimer

Oxford University Press makes no representation, express or implied, that the drug dosages in this book are correct. Readers must therefore always check the product information and clinical procedures with the most up to date published product information and data sheets provided by the manufacturers and the most recent codes of conduct and safety regulations. The authors and the publishers do not accept responsibility or legal liability for any errors in the text or for the misuse or misapplication of material in this work. Except where otherwise stated, drug dosages and recommendations are for the non-pregnant adult who is not breastfeeding.

Contents

Gender considerations in acute coronary syndromes

Chapter:
Gender considerations in acute coronary syndromes
Author(s):

Eva Swahn,

Joakim Alfredsson,

Sofia Sederholm Lawesson

DOI:
10.1093/med/9780199584314.003.0050

Gender differences in ACS have been increasingly recognized. Although women are 5–10 years older than men in an ACS population, mortality rates from cardiovascular causes are similar. Risk factors for coronary heart disease appear to be virtually the same in men and women. Gender differences in symptoms associated with an acute MI have been intensively debated. There seem to be some differences but later studies have shown that chest pain is the most frequent symptom in both women and men.

Gender differences in treatment intensity, including differences in level of care, have been reported. Also differences in benefit from certain treatments, especially invasive treatment, and side effects have been discussed but in the ACS area treatment guidelines make no difference between the genders.

Finally, difference in outcome between men and women, have been proposed. Results have been inconsistent, partly depending on if and how adjustment for differences in background characteristics has been made. Fewer women than men have been included in cardiovascular trials and consequently the evidence base regarding several treatments is less firm for women. Prospective studies to elucidate whether there are true differences in the effects of different treatment strategies according to gender, and the importance of differences in underlying pathophysiology and comorbidity are strongly needed to identify the most appropriate treatment for men and women respectively.

Oxford Medicine requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.