Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Edited by David A. Warrell, Timothy M. Cox, John D. Firth

Online access to the Oxford Textbook of Medicine in low and middle income countries is available through the World Health Organization-led HINARI Access to Research in Health programme

Latest update

The November 2012 update sees updates to over 70 chapters, focusing on Neurology and Gastroenterology. This update also incorporates a selection of 29 Case Histories taken from related titles in the Oxford Case Histories series, linked to from related chapters. Each case includes several questions followed by detailed answers and discussion to enhance diagnostic and clinical understanding.

Neurology updates include substantial updates to key chapters and new material on a wide range of topics including spinal cord injury, autonomic nervous system disorders, and inherited neurodegenerative diseases. 

Gastroenterology updates
include extensive revisions of key chapters on liver failure and acute pancreatitis and new material on a wide range of matters, ranging from the common to the rare: including surgical treatments for colonic diverticular disease, antibody tests for immune disorders, and a revised treatment algorithm for small bowel bacterial overgrowth.

Access token activation

If you have an access token, please click here to activate it.

Sign up for an individual subscription to the Oxford Textbook of Medicine.

Disclaimer

Oxford University Press makes no representation, express or implied, that the drug dosages in this book are correct. Readers must therefore always check the product information and clinical procedures with the most up to date published product information and data sheets provided by the manufacturers and the most recent codes of conduct and safety regulations. The authors and the publishers do not accept responsibility or legal liability for any errors in the text or for the misuse or misapplication of material in this work. Except where otherwise stated, drug dosages and recommendations are for the non-pregnant adult who is not breastfeeding.

Contents

Malignant diseases of the urinary tract

Chapter:
Malignant diseases of the urinary tract
Author(s):

Lih-Ming Wong,

David Neal

DOI:
10.1093/med/9780199204854.003.2118_update_002

Update:

Transitional cell bladder cancer—revised (2009) TNM classification.

Renal cell carcinoma—detailed description of 2009 TNM classification. Discussion of conservative management of small tumours in patients with limited long-term survival.

Prostate cancer—revised (2009) TNM classification

Updated on 31 May 2012. The previous version of this content can be found here.

Essentials

Urological cancers are an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Their treatment frequently involves a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, with patients needing both local therapy to treat the primary tumour and systemic therapy to decrease the risk of metastatic relapse.

Bladder cancer

Bladder cancer usually arises from the transitional epithelium and typically presents with haematuria, lower urinary tract symptoms, pelvic pain, or (metastatic disease) systemic symptoms. Most cases are sporadic and related to cigarette smoking. They are graded histologically as: 1 (low risk of future progression), 2, or 3 (high risk of progression/metastases), and staged according to the tumour–nodes–metastases (TNM) classification, with the most important issues being whether the tumour is muscle invasive (T2 or above) or localized to urothelium only (Ta), and whether there is metastatic disease.

Management—(1) Low-risk noninvasive cancers (TaG1 and TaG2) are treated by endoscopic resection. (2) High-risk non-invasive cancers (TaG3, T1G3, carcinoma in situ) are treated by endoscopic resection plus intravesical immunotherapy with BCG (bacille Calmette–Guerin). (3) Muscle-invasive cancers with no evidence of metastatic disease are treated with radical surgery (cystoprostatectomy or cystectomy/hysterectomy/oophorectomy, with both requiring urinary diversion) or radiotherapy. Systemic chemotherapy is an option as either neo-adjuvant or adjuvant treatment for muscle invasive disease.

Kidney cancer

Kidney cancer most commonly (75–85% of cases) arises from the epithelium of the proximal tubule (clear cell renal carcinoma). Most cases are sporadic, but the condition is common in the von Hippel–Lindau syndrome, and almost all sporadic tumours show mutations in the VHL tumour suppressor gene. Histologically they are graded into Fuhrman grades 1 (best prognosis) to 4 (worst), and staged according to the TNM classification. The most common presentation is as an incidental finding on abdominal imaging, but other presentations include haematuria, loin pain or loin mass.

Management—(1) Surgery (laparoscopic or open) is the primary treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma, which is not responsive to conventional chemotherapy and not radiosensitive. (2) Metastatic renal cell carcinoma has a poor outcome (median survival 8 months): treatments include biological response modifiers to stimulate the immune system (e.g. interleukin and interferon) and small molecules targeting pathways involved in tumour-cell proliferation and angiogenesis (e.g. sorafenib), but response is limited. (3) Small asymptomatic renal masses that are detected incidentally in older patients often grow very slowly and may not alter life expectancy.

Prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is the commonest malignancy in men in the United Kingdom and the United States of America. Diagnosis and treatment is not straightforward because some prostate cancers are indolent and very unlikely to progress, whereas others are highly aggressive.

Diagnosis, grading, and staging—early prostate cancer is asymptomatic: diagnosis is made by combining a digital rectal examination (DRE) with serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement linked to transrectal ultrasound scanning and biopsy. Symptomatic presentation of more advanced disease is typically with lower urinary tract symptoms, or with evidence of metastatic disease. Histologically graded by the Gleason score (well differentiated, 6 or less; moderately differentiated, 7; poorly differentiated, 8–10), and staged according to the TNM classification.

Management—(1) Disease localized to the prostate may be treated with curative intent, either with surgery or radiotherapy, or by ‘active monitoring’ (regular PSA testing and DRE, with treatment if there is evidence of progression). (2) Locally advanced disease can be managed using a combination of radiotherapy and neo-adjuvant hormone therapy. (3) Metastatic prostate cancer is incurable but dramatically responsive to androgen blockade, which is most commonly achieved with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists, although eventually the cancer develops into a hormone-independent state.

Testicular cancer

Typically presents with a painless testicular swelling that may grow rapidly. Ninety per cent are of germ-cell origin—either seminomatous or nonseminomatous. Staged according to the TNMs classification, where ‘s’ designates the serum tumour marker (α-fetoprotein, β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)) level.

Management—all solid testicular masses are usually treated with radical inguinal orchidectomy, after which treatment depends on histological type: (1) seminomas—Stage 1 may be offered para-aortic radiotherapy, or single-dose chemotherapy, or surveillance with chemotherapy given at the time of clinical relapse; Stage 2 is treated with radiotherapy or chemotherapy; (2) nonseminomatous germ cell cancer—Stage 1 may be offered surveillance with chemotherapy on relapse, prophylactic chemotherapy, or primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection; metastatic disease is treated with chemotherapy.

Urothelial cancer

Bladder cancer is the eighth commonest cause of death from malignant disease in England and Wales and the fourth most common cancer in men (data from CRUK 2006). It usually arises from the transitional epithelium that lines the urinary tract from the tips of the renal papillae to the distal urethra, hence transitional cell carcinoma (sometimes known as urothelial cell cancer) may arise in the kidney, ureter, bladder, or urethra. The bladder is the commonest site of origin, where it usually presents with haematuria, lower urinary tract symptoms, pelvic pain, or—when there is metastatic disease—with systemic symptoms.

Other primary epithelial cancers of the bladder include squamous cell carcinoma, which arises in response to chronic inflammation/irritation of the bladder following exposure to schistosomiasis, radiotherapy, chronic infection, or long-term catheterization. Adenocarcinoma can originate from the bladder, arise from urachal remnants in the dome of the bladder, but more commonly is a consequence of locally invasive or metastatic disease from a sigmoid or rectal adenocarcinoma.

Risk factors

The risk factors for urothelial cell cancers are well established (Table 21.18.1) and include male sex, increasing age, and smoking. Occupational exposure to aromatic amines, dyes, and anilines in the dye, rubber, textile and chemical industries increases the risk. The metabolism of aromatic amines involves acetylation through a polymorphic enzyme (N-acetyltransferase 2), with slow acetylator status appearing to be a risk factor. Chronic inflammation associated with schistosomiasis infection predisposes to squamous cell carcinoma and treatment with cyclophosphamide (through its metabolite acrolein) predisposes to bladder cancer. Radiotherapy to the pelvis for the treatment of gynaecological malignancy increases the risk of distal ureteric transitional cell carcinoma fourfold.

Table 21.18.1 Risk factors for transitional carcinoma

Risk factors for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder

Additional risk factors for upper-tract transitional cell carcinoma

Smoking

Analgesic nephropathy (phenacetin)

Increasing age

Papillary necrosis

Male gender

Chinese herb nephropathy

Chemical/occupational exposure

Balkan nephropathy

Cyclophosphamide treatment

Chronic inflammation

Schistosomiasis infection

External beam radiation

Genetic risk factors (rare)

The vast majority of bladder cancer is sporadic and related to cigarette smoking, but one rare genetic syndrome (Lynch’s syndrome—hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer, OMIM 120435) caused by mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes increases the risk of right-sided colon cancer and transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract.

Some Chinese medicines containing aristocholic acid are a cause of Chinese herb nephropathy, and this agent is likely to be the cause of Balkan nephropathy, both of which are strongly associated with upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma (see Chapter 21.9.2).

Genetic changes

Oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes are involved in the pathogenesis of bladder cancer, and there are mutually exclusive genetic alterations that lead to the development of either papillary noninvasive transitional cell carcinoma (stage pTa) or high-grade invasive carcinomas. The most common sporadic genetic mutations in low-grade transitional cell carcinoma are loss of heterozygosity of chromosome 9 and alterations in fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 3. By contrast, high-grade invasive cancers most frequently show loss of tumour suppressor genes which affect the cell cycle such as TP53, RB, and E2F3. Loss of chromosome 8p and alterations in methylation of cytosine residues of particular genes in DNA are also associated with tumour progression in this high-grade invasive group. In the future such alterations may lead to new biomarkers of bladder cancer.

Staging and grading

Histological grade is usually ascribed as grade (G) 1, 2 or 3, with grade 1 tumours being at low risk of future progression and—regardless of tumour stage—grade 3 disease being at high risk for progression and development of metastatic disease.

Clinical bladder cancer staging follows the TNM classification (Table 21.18.2; Fig. 21.18.1). The most important issues are whether the local tumour is muscle invasive (T2 or above) or localized to the urothelium only (Ta), or invading lamina propria (pT1)and whether there is any evidence of metastatic disease to pelvic lymph nodes, bone or lung. Traditionally, bladder cancers were described as either superficial (located in the urothelium or lamina propria—pTa or pT1) or muscle invasive. This division arose on the basis that superficial disease may be resected completely endoscopically via the urethra using electrocautery, but unfortunately this distinction does not truly reflect the risk to patients from a T1G3 bladder cancer or carcinoma in situ, up to one-third of whom will die of bladder cancer.

Malignant diseases of the                 urinary tractTable 21.18.2 TNM classification of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder (2009)

Bladder cancer stage

Stage descriptor

Primary tumour (T stage)

Ta

Noninvasive papillary tumour

Tis/Cis

Carcinoma in situ

T1

Tumour invades lamina propria

T2a

Superficial muscularis propria invaded

T2b

Deep muscularis propria invaded

T3a

Microscopic perivesical fat invasion

T3b

Macroscopic perivesical fat invasion (extravesical mass)

T4

  • Tumour invades prostate, uterus, vagina

  • T4a, pelvic side wall; T4b, abdominal wall

Nodal status

N0

No lymph node metastases

N1

Single nodal metastasis, in true pelvis

N2

Multiple nodal metastases in true pelvis

N3

Common iliac lymph node metastasis

Metastases

M0

No distant metastases

M1

Distant metastases

Fig. 21.18.1
Staging of bladder cancer.

Low-risk noninvasive bladder cancer—TaG1, TaG2

These tumours comprise most of all new bladder cancers (60%), usually present with painless macroscopic haematuria, and are easily diagnosed using flexible cystoscopy under local anaesthetic. Treatment is by endoscopic resection under either spinal or general anaesthesia: a cystoscope is inserted into the bladder through the urethra and electrocautery is used to remove the lesion.

The tumours are usually papillary and are often found on a stalk and fronded, but may be multifocal and will recur locally in the bladder in about 75% of patients in the long term. The risk of progression to muscle-invasive disease with TaG1 disease is extremely low. The risk of recurrent superficial disease can be reduced by the instillation of chemotherapeutic agents (mitomycin C) into the bladder immediately following endoscopic resection. These chemotherapeutic drugs have a high molecular weight, which means that they are usually not absorbed through the bladder mucosa or associated with neutropenia or other systemic side effects.

Patients with noninvasive bladder cancer require long-term endoscopic surveillance of the bladder until they have been free of recurrence disease for 5 years.

High-risk superficial bladder cancer—TaG3, T1G3, carcinoma in situ

Poorly differentiated high-grade bladder tumours have a different genetic profile from low-risk tumours, more akin to muscle-invasive tumours. It is uncommon for a low-risk cancer (pTa, G1, or G2) to progress to a high-risk one, but progression of pT1 or pTa G3 disease to muscle invasion occurs commonly. Isolated TaG3 disease progresses to muscle-invasive disease in up to 40% of patients after 5 years in the absence of aggressive local therapy following endoscopic resection. Adjuvant treatment in the form of intravesical immunotherapy with BCG (bacille Calmette–Guérin) is offered to such patients. This is instilled in to the bladder once per week for 6 weeks, its mechanism of action being via stimulation of T cells that coordinate an immune response to destroy residual disease and reduce the risk of future recurrence. A diagnosis of TaG3 or T1G3 disease should prompt an early second endoscopic resection as the risk of understaging of the first resection is around 20% and some patients will have muscle-invasive disease. If no evidence of muscle invasion is found on repeat resection, a 6-week course of BCG with maintenance dosing every 3 months is advised, or cystectomy can be offered.

Carcinoma in situ is an aggressive intraepithelial neoplasia with a high risk of progression to solid muscle-invasive tumours. It is also treated with intravesical BCG, to which up to 65% of people will respond. Recurrent disease should be treated by cystectomy, if the patient is fit.

Muscle invasive bladder cancer

One in four new bladder tumours are found to be muscle invasive on resection, and up to 50% of these have overt or covert metastases at presentation. Patients with muscle-invasive bladder tumour require staging with a bimanual rectal or vaginal examination at the time of resection to designate a clinical T stage. Staging is completed with a CT scan of the abdomen, pelvis, and chest (Fig. 21.18.2). Routine biochemistry should be checked and if the alkaline phosphatase is elevated a bone scan should be performed.

Fig. 21.18.2
CT scan of the pelvis showing a transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder (arrowhead) demonstrating muscle invasion (arrows).

A patient with muscle-invasive bladder cancer and no evidence of metastatic disease requires aggressive local treatment. Treatment options for the local tumour include either surgery or radiotherapy. Based on a recent Cochrane analysis, radical cystectomy has an overall survival benefit compared to radiotherapy. It is also generally accepted that surgery provides better local control at the expense of higher risk. Some patients (e.g. those with small pT2 lesions away from the trigone of the bladder) will respond well to resection and radiation, or chemoradiation. Radical surgery involves cystoprostatectomy in men and cystectomy, hysterectomy, and oophorectomy in women (anterior exenteration). An extended pelvic lymph node dissection is also performed: this provides prognostic information and is therapeutic for patients with low-volume micrometastatic disease. Urinary diversion is then established by means of an ileal conduit (incontinent cutaneous diversion), or bladder substitution (folding 55 cm of small bowel into a sphere and anastomosing it to the urethra—continent urethral diversion), or a continent cutaneous reservoir (less common, as it frequently requires reoperation).

Alternative local therapy can be provided by means of radiotherapy to the bladder. The major benefit of this approach is that it allows bladder preservation, thereby avoiding the many long-term side effects of urinary diversion. However, it does place the patient at risk of developing a second muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Overall up to 50% of patients have persistent or subsequent recurrent disease in the bladder, and up to 30% will require a subsequent cystectomy.

Bladder cancer is moderately chemosensitive, hence systemic chemotherapy is an option as either neo-adjuvant or adjuvant treatment for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Neo-adjuvant treatment in the form of MVAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, and cisplatin) provides a 5 to 7.5% overall survival benefit for patients who subsequently undergo radical cystectomy or radiation treatment. Chemotherapy is also used in patients with node-positive disease or lymphovascular space invasion at the time of cystectomy, although many are too debilitated following surgery to receive chemotherapy.

Metastatic transitional cell carcinoma

Patients with regional metastatic disease to lymph nodes in the pelvis can be given chemotherapy if they are fit enough. This may result in complete radiological resolution, after which cystectomy can be performed. If residual active cancer is identified in the pelvic lymph nodes or there is invasion of the lymphovascular space, then the patient has a very poor prognosis.

Patients with nonregional metastatic disease to bones, liver, lungs, or abdominal lymph nodes have a very low 5-year survival. Chemotherapy can be offered if the patient has good performance status. Palliative radiotherapy to the bladder helps in local control and reduces haematuria, or ureteric obstruction which can lead to renal failure.

Transitional cell carcinoma of the kidney or ureter

Malignant diseases of the                 urinary tractPatients with high-grade bladder cancer are at risk of developing upper-tract transitional cell carcinoma (c.5%). Other specific risk factors for its development are listed in Table 21.18.1. Presentations can include haematuria, loin pain or loin mass. Investigations for assessment of upper tract tumours include intravenous urograms and CT urograms to assess for filling defects in the collecting system. Ureteropyeloscopy with washings and biopsy are used to visualize the tumour and obtain a cytological and histological diagnosis. Accurate staging, grading, and surveillance of the upper tracts is difficult and recurrence rates are high, hence these patients are generally best treated with nephroureterectomy if the contralateral kidney is normal. Ureteropyeloscopy and laser can be used for treatment of small, low grade tumours. Annual cystoscopy is recommended thereafter because over 50% of patients with new upper-tract transitional cell carcinoma will go on to develop transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.

Kidney cancer

In the United Kingdom renal cell cancer was the 10th commonest tumour in men and 15th commonest in women in 2004, with a 3:2 male:female incidence. The incidence is increasing in the United Kingdom and across the Western world, largely as a result of the routine use of abdominal imaging. More than 50% of renal tumours are found incidentally on imaging whereas only 6-10% present with the classic triad of haematuria, loin pain and loin mass. Most tumours detected in such a way are small and asymptomatic with an excellent prognosis. In the United Kingdom, however, there has also been an increasing mortality from kidney cancer that appears to be due to an increasing number of patients presenting with advanced and metastatic disease, which is a major concern when most other common cancers now have decreasing mortality rates.

Primary kidney cancer arises from the renal parenchyma in 90% of cases. There are different histological subtypes, each of which is important as they have different prognoses and different genetic causes. Kidney cancer that arises from the epithelium of the proximal tubule is known as conventional or clear cell renal carcinoma (75–85%). Other histological subtypes include papillary (15%), chromophobe (5%), collecting duct (<1%), and unclassified tumours. Some 5 to 10% of cancers in the kidney arise from the epithelium of the collecting system and are therefore classified as transitional cell carcinoma of the upper tract. Secondary tumours of the kidney occur in association with lymphoma, breast, and lung cancer. Primary renal cell carcinoma tends to metastasize to lung, lymph nodes, and bone (lytic lesions), and less commonly to liver, brain, and soft tissue.

Risk factors

The risk factors for sporadic renal cell carcinoma include increasing age, male sex, and cigarette smoking, obesity and hypertension. Smoking conveys a relative risk of twofold for developing conventional renal cell carcinoma and is the most consistent of studied risk factors. Patients on dialysis may develop acquired cystic disease of the kidneys, which increases the risk of renal cell carcinoma between 5 and 30 times. Patients with a previous history of sporadic renal cell carcinoma treated with radical nephrectomy have a 1% risk per decade of developing a metachronous tumour.

Patients with inherited cancer syndromes associated with renal cell carcinoma develop multifocal tumours at a younger age than those with sporadic renal cell carcinoma. Von Hippel–Lindau syndrome (OMIM 193300) has several different subtypes, with differing likelihood of developing renal cell carcinoma. Family members tend to develop renal tumours at the same age as the index case, hence screening is performed at the appropriate ages in younger probands. Cumulative exposure to radiation is an important consideration in the long-term follow-up of such patients: wherever possible MRI and ultrasonography are used for screening.

Genetic changes

There are both sporadic and genetic (familial) forms of renal cell carcinoma. Genetic renal cell carcinoma is associated with Von Hippel–Lindau syndrome. Hereditary papillary renal cell carcinoma comes in two forms: type I associated with mutations in the receptor for hepatocyte growth factor, c-MET; and type II associated with mutations in the fumarate hydratase gene. Birtt–Hogge–Dube syndrome (OMIM 135150) is associated with chromophobe carcinoma, and there are other rare inherited syndromes. Knowledge of kidney cancer genetics has been derived mainly from studying these several rare inherited syndromes.

The genetic alterations in von Hippel–Lindau syndrome are found in a tumour suppressor gene located on chromosome 3 at locus 3p25–26. Individuals with von Hippel–Lindau syndrome inherit the abnormality of this tumour suppressor gene as a germ-line mutation, with tumours developing in an individual with subsequent knock-out of the single normal gene either by mutation, deletion, or methylation, hence this tumour follows Knudson’s two-hit hypothesis (see Chapter 6.2). In sporadic renal cell carcinoma nearly 100% of tumours also show loss of 3p 25–26, with the mutations in chromosome 3 in sporadic RCC forming a wider spectrum than those seen in von Hippel–Lindau syndrome. A protein known as hypoxia inducible factor 1 α (HIF-1α) is part of the normal cellular mechanism for adaptation to hypoxia, allowing cells to grow and survive under hypoxic conditions (such as those seen with rapid growth of solid tumours) by inducing the expression of angiogenic growth factors such as VEGF. The von Hippel–Lindau tumour suppressor gene product normally targets HIF1-α for destruction in the proteosome by means of ubiquitinylation. In its absence the end result is that high levels of VEGF drive tumorigenesis, and drive the marked angiogenesis that is such a feature of renal cell carcinoma (Fig. 21.18.3).Small-molecule inhibitors of VEGF have now been developed for clinical use.

Figure 21.18.3
VHL gene mutation leading to decreased degradation of HIF and accumulation of cytokines that drive tumour genesis. From Linehan WM, Walther MM, Zbar B (2003). The genetic basis of cancer of the kidney. J Urol, 170, 2163–72. Copyright Elsevier.

There are also well-established genetic abnormalities for papillary renal cell carcinoma, including mutation in the c-met oncogene, gains in chromosomes 7 and 17, loss of chromosome Y, and mutations in fumarate hydratase. The genetic locus involved in the hereditary form of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma has recently been identified, which should allow further research in to the abnormalities found in sporadic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.

Diagnosis, staging, and grading

Renal cell carcinoma is staged by the TNM classification (Table 21.18.3). If a solid mass is detected in the kidney on ultrasonography, a contrast-enhanced CT scan of the abdomen and chest is performed to evaluate the mass, and to assess for metastatic disease. Solid masses in the parenchyma typically enhance with intravenous contrast, and more than 90% of such masses are malignant. Percutaneous core biopsy has a 10 to 20% nonconclusive rate and is not routinely done for large masses as the positive predictive value for imaging is high. It is useful if there is a strong suspicion that lymphoma may be responsible, or there is a suspicion that the renal lesion is metastatic, or where surgery may lead to renal failure because there is significant renal impairment.

Malignant diseases of the                 urinary tractTable 21.18.3 TNM classification of renal cell carcinoma (2009)

Kidney cancer stage

TNM descriptor

T stage

T1a

Tumour ≤4cm limited to the kidney

T1b

Tumour >4cm but ≤7cm limited to the kidney

T2a

Tumour >7cm but ≤10cm limited to the kidney

T2b

Tumour >10cm limited to the kidney

T3a

Tumour grossly extends into the renal vein or tumour invades perirenal fat but not beyond Gerota's fascia

T3b

Tumour grossly extends into the vena cava below the diaphragm

T3c

Tumour grossly extends into vena cava above the diaphragm or invades the wall of the vena cava

T4

Nodal status

N0

No nodal metastases

N1

Metastasis in single regional lymph node

N2

Metastasis in more than 1 regional lymph node

Metastases

M1

No distant metastases

M2

Distant metastases

Simple cystic masses with no internal echoes or septation occur in the renal parenchyma of 50% of 50-year-olds and are benign. Complex cysts (meaning those with septation, calcification, or solid elements) on ultrasonography require CT scanning to detect enhancing elements and are likely to be well-differentiated cystic renal cell carcinomas.

Clinical staging with CT allows identification of metastatic disease to lymph nodes, adrenal glands, liver, and chest. Renal cell carcinoma also frequently metastasizes to bone, where lytic lesions are typically found. A bone scan is performed if the patient has bone pain or an elevated alkaline phosphatase. Another important feature of renal cell carcinoma is the propensity for the tumour to invade the renal vein and subsequently the inferior vena cava (Fig. 21.18.4), even extending as far as the right atrium. Staging with multislice CT or MRI or Doppler ultrasound is important to determine the distal extent of the tumour thrombus as this affects the surgical approach required.

Fig. 21.18.4
Left renal cell cancer (RCC) spreading through the renal vein (arrows) into the inferior vena cava (arrowhead).

The Fuhrman grading system for renal cell cancer is a histological grading system based on the architecture and size of the nucleus assessed at low power. This is graded 1–4, with 4 designating a worse prognosis, and carries independent prognostic information.

Paraneoplastic phenomena

Paraneoplastic syndromes are common in renal cell carcinoma and include hypercalcaemia, polycythaemia from erythropoietin production, anaemia, weight loss, leucocytosis, hypertension and elevated ESR. Stauffer’s syndrome comprises abnormal liver function tests and coagulation defects that normalize after nephrectomy. If suspected paraneoplastic syndromes do not disappear following nephrectomy, then it is likely that there is undiagnosed metastatic disease.

Treatment

Malignant diseases of the                 urinary tractRenal cell cancer is not responsive to conventional chemotherapy and is not radiosensitive. Surgery is therefore the primary treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma. Radical nephrectomy involves removal of the kidney within Gerota’s fascia (renal fascia), with en bloc removal of the ipsilateral adrenal gland and hilar lymph nodes. Partial nephrectomy is increasingly used to excise small solid masses in patients with a solitary kidney, impaired renal function, or bilateral tumours, and also as primary treatment in people with normal renal function. In patients with limited long-term survival, small renal tumours are being increasingly managed with surveillance regimens and also minimally-invasive techniques such as cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation. The surgical approach to the kidney may be with open or laparoscopic surgery.

Laparoscopic surgery

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy was first performed in 1991, and this is now the gold standard for surgical treatment of T1 tumours. The oncological outcomes are equivalent to open surgery, and postoperative recovery is much faster, with shorter hospital stay, lower analgesic requirement, and earlier return to paid employment. The role for laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is expanding, with experienced surgeons now treating selected T2 tumours. Partial nephrectomy may also be performed laparoscopically by a skilled team, but this is a difficult procedure that is performed well only by a small number of surgeons throughout the world.

Open surgery

The approach to the kidney may either be through the abdomen (anterior), through the flank, or by a combined approach through the chest and abdomen (thoracoabdominal). Most T2 or more advanced localized cancers are treated with an anterior approach. Tumours that involve the renal vein and inferior vena cava (Fig. 21.18.4) may be treated surgically with good outcomes if the tumour thrombus has not invaded the wall of the cava (it usually projects as a floating tongue of thrombus inside the vessel). Such surgery involves mobilization of the liver and may require cardiac bypass if the tumour thrombus reaches the right atrium. Open partial nephrectomy is now the treatment of choice for small primary renal cell carcinomas as there is preservation of renal function and decreased overall mortality and number of cardiovascular events compared to radical nephrectomy.

Metastatic disease

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma has a poor outcome with very short median survival, although there are rare reports (0.8% of cases) of regression of metastatic disease following nephrectomy. Management varies according to the volume of metastatic disease, the sites of metastases, and patient’s performance status. Those with metastases to the brain, liver, and bone tend to have a poor prognosis, whereas those with nonbulky lymph node disease and pulmonary metastases have a better outlook.

Patients with good performance status (meaning that they are systemically well) and low-volume metastatic disease have survival benefit if they undergo a nephrectomy. Given that renal cell cancer is not responsive to conventional chemotherapy, other treatment is with biological response modifiers that are used to stimulate the immune system, the response to which also appears to be better if a patient has had a nephrectomy. Interleukin has a better complete response rate than interferon, but is very toxic with significant side effects, hence the latter is the most commonly used biological agent. Interferon can be administered on an outpatient basis, three times a week via a subcutaneous injection, but the partial response is only 10 to 15%, with a complete response rate of 2%. The most exciting developments for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma are small-molecule therapies targeted at pathways involved in tumour-cell proliferation and angiogenesis. One such promising agent can be taken orally (sorafenib) and prevents angiogenesis via inhibition of Raf-kinase and VEGF receptors, pathways which are up-regulated in renal cancers because of loss of the von Hippel–Lindau gene (as described previously). Sorafenib and other similar drugs are not cytotoxic but are cytostatic: they have the potential to prevent progression of metastatic disease, thus potentially turning this into a chronic illness as opposed to a rapidly fatal condition. Trials have demonstrated modest improvements (4-6 months) in progression free survival compared to placebo and interferon.

Palliative treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma includes radiotherapy to painful bony metastases, prophylactic orthopaedic surgery where severe cortical bone loss has occurred in weight-bearing long bones, whole-brain irradiation for brain metastases, and blood transfusion. There is little role for palliative chemotherapy.

Prognosis

As for many malignancies, long-term prognosis in renal cell carcinoma is strongly dependent on the initial clinical stage. Table 21.18.4 shows 5-year survival according to the original Robson classification. The presence of metastatic disease portends a very poor prognosis, with a median survival of only 8 months. The AJCC 1997 classification of primary renal tumour size designated a cut-off point of 7 cm to differentiate between T1 and T2 tumours: T1 tumours have now been separated into T1a (<4 cm) and T1b (4–7 cm), reflecting the excellent prognosis of small renal masses that are detected incidentally.

Table 21.18.4 Survival from renal cell carcinoma according to Robson stage

Robson kidney cancer stage

5-year survival (%)

Stage I

60–95

Stage II

47–80

Stage III

35–50

Stage IV

<5 (median survival 8 months)

The outcome of small asymptomatic renal masses that are detected incidentally (‘incidentalomas’) is not yet clear, but it appears that in many cases they grow very slowly and may not threaten an individual’s life expectancy. Historically renal masses less than 3 cm in size were classified as renal adenomas, although histologically some of these were likely to have been papillary tumours. Elderly patients or others who would be high risk for surgery can be offered monitoring with 3-monthly ultrasonography when a small (<4 cm) mass is diagnosed: if the size (volume) of the tumour is unchanged over 12 months, then most such lesions appear to remain stable over time. However, this approach is not yet validated and should not be recommended for young patients with small solid renal masses, because once renal cell cancer has metastasized there is little chance of cure.

Prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is an important health problem: it is the commonest malignancy in men in the United Kingdom and the United States of America and is second only to lung cancer as a cause of death from malignancy. In England and Wales it results in over 10 000 deaths annually. In the United States the recognized incidence of prostate cancer rose sharply after the introduction of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in the early 1990s, but despite this the mortality from the condition has remained relatively static over the same time period, recently demonstrating a small decrease which has been ascribed to treatment for early-stage disease. However, in the United Kingdom, where PSA testing is not routine, there has also been a small decrease in mortality from prostate cancer, making it unlikely that changes in death rates are solely due to aggressive treatment of early cancers.

The diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer is more complex than it immediately appears. Difficulties arise because some prostate cancers are rather indolent, have long latent periods, and are highly unlikely to progress and cause metastatic disease in a given individual; by contrast, other prostate cancers are highly aggressive, and some have an intermediate risk. The challenge is to diagnose prostate cancer while it is localized and to treat those people who have clinically significant disease that is likely to threaten longevity. This is difficult because there are no biomarkers that predict accurately whether a man is likely to die from prostate cancer. The natural history of untreated prostate cancer is also poorly defined: autopsy studies reveal microscopic foci of prostate cancer in up to 60% of 60-year-olds, yet only 3% of these men will eventually die of the disease.

Risk factors

Increasing age is a strong risk factor, but genetic risk factors are also important. Some men with first degree relatives affected by prostate cancer have a two- to threefold higher risk, the risk being higher if the first-degree relative is a brother as opposed to a father. Ethnicity also influences the risk of prostate cancer, with African-Americans having the highest risk and Asian men the lowest risk. Dietary factors may play a role: lycopene (found in tomatoes), selenium, and vitamin E are potentially protective; a Western-style high-fat diet is associated with a high risk for prostate cancer in the developed world, and probably plays a role in the increasing risk of such cancer in Japanese men who migrate to the United States of America. As for many cancers, it is likely that there is an interaction between environmental factors and an inherited genetic predisposition leading to prostate cancer.

Genetic changes

Around 5 to 10% of all prostate cancer is thought to be related to a highly penetrant genetic predisposition, and genetic factors may be responsible for as many as 40% of those prostate cancers appearing at an early age (diagnosed prior to age 50 years). Several different putative prostate cancer genes are under evaluation, including HPC1 (chromosome 1), HPC2 (chromosome 17), MSR1 (macrophage scavenging receptor 1—chromosome 8), and RNASEl. Men from families harbouring a BRAC2 mutation have a fivefold increase in risk of prostate cancer. Recent genome wide scans have found more than 30 predisposition alleles known as single nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs]. Many prostate cancers demonstrate a translocation between the androgen-regulated TMPRS2 gene and the ETS transcription factor, putting the latter under the control of an androgen-regulated promoter.

The androgen receptor plays an important role in cell signalling, progression, and metastases in prostate cancer, and androgen blockade (antitestosterone agents) can produce clinical regression of local and metastatic disease. Mutations in the androgen receptor leading to overexpression or altered ligand binding are associated with the development of later hormone independence.

Diagnosis, staging, and grading

The prostate is divided into different zones (peripheral, central, transitional, periurethral, and fibromuscular) based on different embryological origins, with most prostate cancers (75%) arising in the peripheral zone. Early prostate cancer does not give rise to any symptoms, whereas locally advanced disease may cause lower urinary tract symptoms or haematuria, and metastatic disease may present with bone pain from sclerotic metastases. As early prostate cancer is asymptomatic, diagnosis is currently achieved by combining a digital rectal examination (DRE) with a PSA measurement linked to transrectal ultrasound scanning and biopsy of the prostate (TRUSP).

PSA is a serum protease that is secreted by prostatic epithelium. It is not a specific marker for cancer as there are many nonmalignant processes that also elevate PSA, such as benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), urinary tract infection, urinary tract instrumentation, ejaculation, and traumatic catheterization. Age-adjusted norms for PSA are available to improve the sensitivity and specificity of the measurement in clinical practice, an alternative approach being to set a predetermined cut-off above which further evaluation is recommended. PSA kinetics may be more valuable in making treatment decisions than a single value: a rapidly rising PSA with a short doubling time (even if starting at a very low number) indicates that a man is likely to have high-risk prostate cancer.

If a man has an elevated PSA or an abnormal DRE and there is no evidence of urinary or prostatic infection which might explain the elevation, then it is recommended that the patient undergoes a transrectal ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of the prostate under local anaesthesia, taking about 10 separate biopsies which will detect 80 to 85% of clinically significant prostate cancers.

Histological analysis is carried out by Gleason grading. The architecture is graded into five categories (1–5) for the most prominent pattern, the second most prominent pattern is assigned a secondary Gleason score, and the two scores are added together to give a Gleason sum (e.g. 3 + 4 = 7). Well-differentiated disease has a Gleason sum of 6 or less, moderately differentiated disease is 7, and poorly differentiated disease 8 to 10. It is unusual to diagnose a Gleason sum of less than 6 on needle biopsy; very well differentiated prostate cancers (Gleason <5) may be diagnosed following a transurethral resection of prostate and are usually indolent. The Gleason score is predictive of outcome: large observational studies show that men with poorly differentiated disease have a 60 to 80% chance of dying from prostate cancer within 15 years of diagnosis. The biggest problem is predicting outcome in the individual with Gleason 6 or 7 disease.

Prostate cancer is staged using the AJCC system (Table 21.18.5). When prostate cancer metastasizes it frequently goes to the pelvis, to non-regional lymph nodes, other bones (sclerotic metastases), and also local pelvic structures. It rarely invades the rectum, with Denonvillier’s fascia providing a natural barrier. Digital rectal examination provides clinical T stage. Endorectal MRI may allow for improved pre-operative staging when interpreted by experienced radiologists. A bone scan is performed to evaluate for metastatic disease.

Malignant diseases of the                 urinary tractTable 21.18.5 TNM classification of prostate cancer (2009)

Prostate cancer stage

TNM Descriptor

Primary tumour (T stage)

T1a

<5% of TURP chips

T1b

>5% of chips or high grade prostate cancer

T1c

Biopsy detected in benign feeling gland

T2a

Nodule <50% one lobe of prostate

T2b

Nodule >50% of one lobe

T2c

Nodules both lobes

T3

Disease extends outside prostate

T4

Invades other local organs/structures

Nodal status

N0

No metastatic disease to lymph nodes

N1

Regional lymph node metastasis

Metastases

M0

No metastases

M1a

Nonregional lymph node metastases

M1b

Bone metastases

M1c

Other sites

Screening

Screening for prostate cancer is a controversial issue. There are several large trials currently evaluating whether prostate cancer screening should be recommended. In the United Kingdom screening is not recommended as it does not fulfil World Health Organization or United Kingdom national screening guidelines. There is no doubt that prostate cancer is an important health problem, but with PSA screening most cancers currently detected are low volume, well differentiated, often indolent, and do not threaten an individual’s life expectancy.

Several large observational studies have aided our understanding of the risk of prostate cancer death following diagnosis. Screening with a PSA and DRE is imperfect as there are many nonmalignant reasons for PSA elevation, thus subjecting many men to a potentially morbid prostate biopsy (with complications including sepsis, haemorrhage, pain, and urinary symptoms). Assigning age-derived normal PSA values with a cut-off point does not detect all clinically relevant prostate cancer, as shown in the prostate cancer prevention trial where a significant number of Gleason 3 + 4 cancers were found with a PSA between 0 and 2.5 ng/ml (normal).

Although there are well-established treatment options for screen-detected prostate cancer, there are no robust randomized trials demonstrating efficacy of treatment or revealing which option provides the best outcome. One important clinical trial randomized patients in a pre-PSA era to watchful waiting or radical prostatectomy, showing an improvement in overall and prostate cancer specific survival for patients treated with radical prostatectomy. The ProtecT (United Kingdom) and PIVOT (United States of America) trials should provide useful further information, but it must be remembered that treatments for prostate cancer are not without significant morbidity, including impotence and incontinence (discussed below). One recent large randomized trial of screening, the European Randomized Study of Screening for prostate cancer (ERSPC), has shown a 20% reduction in prostate cancer deaths. However, this was at the price of considerable overdiagnosis and over treatment, with 1400 men needed to be screened and 50 men required to be treated to save one life. A recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials concluded that screening for prostate cancer does not have a significant impact on overall mortality or mortality specific to prostate cancer, but this will not be the last word on the issue.

Treatment

Treatment options for prostate cancer are dependent on many factors, including patient age, life expectancy, stage, Gleason grade, PSA kinetics, and tumour volume. For practical purposes patients are classified into having localized disease, locally advanced disease, or metastatic disease. One very important factor in the choice of treatment for a man with low- or intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer is the patient’s view of the risks and benefits of treatment.

Localized disease

Disease localized to the prostate may be treated with curative intent, with either surgery or radiotherapy. Patients are eligible for radical treatment if they have a life expectancy greater than 10 years, reflecting the fact that because prostate cancer is generally slow growing, the benefit from treatment of early-stage prostate cancer is not gained unless the patient lives at least another decade. More conservative approaches such as ‘active monitoring’ are very reasonable options for patients with low volume localized disease and favourable Gleason grade. This form of management involves regular PSA testing and rectal examination and aims to treat prostate cancer once there is evidence of progression (increasing PSA or increases in local stage on rectal examination), but before there is metastatic disease.

Radical surgery

Radical prostatectomy involves removal of the prostate gland and seminal vesicles, plus or minus a pelvic lymph node dissection, followed by anastomosis of the bladder to the urethra. This can be performed by open or laparoscopic surgery, and the latter can be performed using a robotic three-dimensional system with superior instruments and vision over standard laparoscopy (Figs. 21.18.5 and 21.18.6).

Fig. 21.18.5
Patient in theatre undergoing robotic prostatectomy.

Fig. 21.18.6
One of the authors sitting at robotic console during radical prostatectomy.

After surgery there should be no detectable PSA in the serum, with PSA recurrence (rising PSA after surgery) indicating either local recurrence or metastatic disease. The long-term outcomes for screen-detected prostate cancer are good, with 80 to 90% 5-year biochemical-free survival (undetectable PSA). Local recurrent disease may follow where there are positive margins on the radical prostatectomy specimens, the chances of which can be reduced by low-dose radiotherapy in men at high risk of this complication.

The neurovascular bundles which produce penile erection and a sense of orgasm run very close to the prostate and are at risk during the operation (Fig 21.18.7 and Fig 21.18.8).Their preservation depends on the skill of the surgeon, and whether the stage and grade of the tumour argue for a more radical excision of periprostatic tissue. The seminal vesicles are removed with the prostate, hence ejaculation is invariably absent. The risk of urinary incontinence is related to the potential for injury to the external urinary sphincter, just distal to the prostate, and is also dependent on the skill of the surgeon. The best outcomes from surgery are achieved in centres where surgeons perform a large number of operations.

Fig. 21.18.7
A. Cross-section through the apex of the prostate demonstrating the relationship between fascia surrounding the striated sphincter, neurovascular bundles, the striated sphincter, and the smooth muscle on the urethra. B. Cross-section through mid portion of prostate demonstrating relationship between the neurovascular bundles between levator fascia and prostatic fascia, anterior to Denonvillier’s fascia. When doing radical prostatectomy it is important that the prostatic fascia remain intact. From Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA (eds) (2007). Campbell-Walsh Urology, 9th edition. Volume 3, figure 97-4, p. 2958. Copyright Elsevier.

Figure 21.18.8
Retrograde dissection of the prostate (open technique) with progressive branches of the neurovascular bundles being clipped. From Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA (eds) (2007). Campbell-Walsh Urology, Volume 3, figure 97-8, p. 2969. Copyright Elsevier.

Radical radiotherapy

Radical radiotherapy may be delivered using either external beam treatment or internally via brachytherapy (radioactive seeds implanted into the prostate). The cancer cure rates for surgery and radiotherapy are similar, with patient choice being the most important factor in deciding which treatment option is preferred. Overall there is slightly less urinary morbidity from radiotherapy. However, the risks of radiotherapy include rectal bleeding, diarrhoea, urinary frequency and urgency, haematuria and erectile dysfunction. There also appears to be an increase in the risk of secondary cancers following pelvic radiotherapy, including rectal carcinoma.

Locally advanced disease

Locally advanced disease is described as cT3 or cT4 using the TNM classification. The definition of T3 disease is that it has either invaded the seminal vesicles or has spread beyond the prostate capsule as suggested by MRI or DRE. T4 disease invades the bladder base, urethral sphincter, or pelvic side wall. This is therefore a relatively heterogeneous group of patients, including some with early T3 disease and others with significant locally advanced disease. Some T3 patients can be managed using a combination of radiotherapy and neo-adjuvant hormone therapy. Radical prostatectomy with subsequent radiotherapy (multimodal therapy) is now being used more commonly with early T3 disease. Patients with T4 disease are treated similarly, but also offered palliative radiotherapy as there is a high likelihood of both local recurrence and undetected micrometastatic disease. In the future multimodality treatment with chemoradiation and hormonal treatments, or combinations with radical surgery are likely to be tested in trials.

Metastatic prostate cancer

Metastatic prostate cancer is incurable but is dramatically hormone responsive. Androgens (testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, and dihydroepiandrostenedione—DHEA) drive prostate cancer growth via the androgen receptor. Androgen blockade at any point along the hypothalamic–pituitary axis results in tumour control, with temporary regression of local and metastatic disease in most men. Various forms of androgen blockade are available, including luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists, which work by providing a constant level of LHRH that prevents the physiological release of LH that is triggered by pulsatile gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH). Other options include orchidectomy or the use of antiandrogens. The most reliable forms of androgen blockade are LHRH agonists and orchidectomy. Patients are sometimes opposed to the latter for body image and psychological reasons, making LHRH agonists the most widely used form of castration.

Advanced prostate cancer treated by androgen ablation eventually develops into a hormone-independent state through selection of androgen-insensitive clones, or via further dedifferentiation of prostate cancer. Once a state of hormone independence is reached the median survival is less than 18 to 24 months. Second-line hormonal manipulations may result in PSA decline: these include the addition of an antiandrogen, or the use of oestrogens or ketaconazole, the latter being quite toxic. There is no proven survival benefit for such measures, but a decline in PSA may correlate with delayed progression. Chemotherapy with taxanes can result in modest improvements in overall survival in men with hormone-unresponsive disease and is now being trialled as an adjuvant treatment for high-risk early-stage prostate cancer. Vaccination against a prostate tumour antigen has been reported to produce modest improvement in overall survival in men with advanced hormone-refractory disease, although (surprisingly) in the absence of any measurable antitumour effect. Many novel agents are in clinical trials.

Haematuria, lower urinary tract symptoms, and distal ureteric obstruction are common manifestations in patients with hormone-independent prostate cancer. Haematuria may be treated with palliative radiotherapy to the prostate bed, and symptoms suggestive of bladder outflow obstruction can be treated with a channel transurethral prostatic resection if the patient’s performance status allows. Distal ureteric obstruction results in obstructive renal failure and may be treated with ureteric stenting in selected cases, but such intervention should not be pursued in a patient who is obviously terminally ill.

Bone metastases may cause pain, pathological fractures, or spinal cord compression. Radiotherapy in single fractions is useful in alleviating painful bone disease. Zoledronic acid, a potent bisphosphonate, can be used to reduce skeletal-related events.

Testicular cancer

Testicular cancer accounts for 1% of male malignancies and is unusual in that it occurs predominantly in young men, being the most common tumour in 15- to 44-year-olds in the United Kingdom. The peak incidence of 15 cases per 100 000 is in the fourth decade. Testicular cancer is also unusual for a solid tumour in that more than 90% of cases are curable using a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy.

Testicular cancer is becoming commoner in the Western world, predominantly in white men, and there is geographical variation in incidence amongst white populations, with a higher incidence in northern European men.

Risk factors

Cryptorchidism (undescended testis) is a risk factor for the development of testicular cancer, with the risk in the undescended gonad increasing with the severity of maldescent. The risk is at least 10-fold increased for a testis descended to or below the inguinal canal, and even greater for testes with arrested descent in the abdomen. Such patients also have an increased risk (c.5%) of developing a tumour in the normally descended contralateral gonad, particularly if the testis is small and atrophic. Patients with inherited syndromes, including Kleinfelter’s and Down’s syndrome, are also at increased risk of testicular cancer. Between 1 and 3% of patients report a positive family history of testicular cancer.

The pathogenesis of testicular cancer is thought to involve a noninvasive precursor stage, termed intratubular germ cell neoplasia (IGCN) or carcinoma in situ. Although the natural history of this condition is not completely defined, it would appear that most men with it eventually progress to invasive testicular cancer.

Presentation and diagnosis

Patients present with a testicular swelling that is usually painless and may grow rapidly. Symptoms and signs including back pain, weight loss, lymphadenopathy, headache, shortness of breath, and haemoptysis all suggest metastatic disease. Clinical examination of scrotal swellings is crucial, with key questions being: (1) is it arising in the scrotum? (a hernia comes down from above); (2) is it confined to the body of the testis (a testis cancer is within the testis); and (3) does it transilluminate (i.e. is it cystic or solid). A solid swelling in the body of the testis is a testicular tumour until proved otherwise.

When a testicular mass is detected on clinical examination, a scrotal ultrasound examination (Fig 21.18.9)is performed to determine if the mass is solid or cystic—cystic scrotal masses are benign and include epididymal cysts and hydroceles. Solid testicular masses are usually malignant, but may be difficult to differentiate from focal infection, infarction, and epidermoid tumours. Preoperative blood is taken for serum tumour markers—α-fetoprotein, β-hCG, and LDH.

Figure 21.18.9
Ultrasound scan of testis showing lesion of heterogenous echogenicity replacing most of testis. (Courtesy of Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Urology and Radiology departments.)

About 5% of germ-cell tumours present at an extragonadal site, usually in either the retroperitoneum or mediastinum. Some such patients will have carcinoma in situ of the testis, or a burnt-out primary testicular tumour manifested as a focal testicular scar on ultrasonography.

Histological subtypes of testicular cancer

Over 90% of testicular cancer is of germ-cell origin: a few tumours are derived from stromal and supporting cells, either Leidig or Sertoli cell tumours. Testicular tumours in men over the age of 50 are commonly either lymphoma or metastatic, although a subtype of germ-cell cancers known as spermatocytic seminoma occur in older men. Germ-cell tumours are classified as shown in Table 21.18.6. For clinical purposes testicular cancer is divided into seminomatous or nonseminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT), the treatment of these two categories being different. Mixed tumours are classified as nonseminomatous tumours. Serum tumour markers for testicular cancer are very useful in diagnosis and in follow-up after orchidectomy.

Table 21.18.6 Classification of testicular germ cell tumours

Histological subtypes of primary testicular cancer

Percentage of cases

Seminomatous germ-cell tumours

55.4

Classical

Anaplastic

Spermatocyctic

Nonseminomatous germ-cell tumours

Embryonal

13.5

Teratocarcinoma

11.5

Choriocarcinoma

 1.8

Yolk sac

 1.2

Mature teratoma

 3.7

Mixed germ-cell tumour (e.g. embryonal and seminoma)

12.9

Staging

Testicular cancer is initially staged with a CT scan of the abdomen, pelvis, and chest. Clinical stage is determined using the TNM classification. The degree of tumour marker elevation carries independent prognostic information and is incorporated into the TNM classification—‘TNMs’, where ‘s’ designates the serum tumour marker level.

Testicular lymphatic drainage is based on the embryological origin of the testis from the mesonephric ridge in the retroperitoneum, hence the most common sites for metastatic disease are the retroperitoneal para-aortic lymph nodes and the chest (Fig. 21.18.10).

Fig. 21.18.10
CT scan showing a very large metastatic para-aortic lymph node mass (arrows) from a testicular seminoma.

Treatment

A solid testicular mass is usually treated with radical inguinal orchidectomy through an inguinal incision, with excision of the testis, cord and all of their coverings (spermatic fascia). Testicular cancer is the model par excellence of a curable solid malignancy. Treatment strategies are tailored to the clinical stage and involve combinations of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. The excellent overall cancer cure rates for the young men presenting with this disease mean that the long-term effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy are potential significant issues (such as the development of secondary malignancy). Much effort is therefore placed on minimizing side effects of treatment while maintaining excellent cure rates.

Seminoma

Stage I seminoma has a cure rate approaching 100%. About 12% of men with clinical stage I disease have occult disease in the retroperitoneal nodes and may be offered para-aortic radiotherapy, or single-dose carboplatin chemotherapy, or surveillance with chemotherapy given at the time of clinical relapse. Patients at higher risk of relapse include those with tumours greater than 4 cm in size or those with invasion of the rete testis, and it is these patients who may chose to have adjuvant therapy.

Stage II seminoma has metastasized to the retroperitoneal lymph nodes and may either be low or high volume. Low-volume disease may be treated with radiotherapy or chemotherapy, whereas high-volume disease is best treated with three cycles of chemotherapy (bleomycin, etopiside, and cisplatin (BEP))

In the presence of advanced metastatic disease (stages III and IV), patients with seminoma are classified as having intermediate prognosis and have survival rates approaching 80% with the use of chemotherapy (Table 21.18.7). Following treatment patients may be left with a residual mass in the retroperitoneum, the treatment of which is discussed later.

Table 21.18.7 Prognostic groupings of germ-cell cancers according to the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG)

Seminoma germ-cell tumour prognosis (IGCCCG classification)

Nonseminomatous germ-cell tumour

Good prognosis

Any primary, no non-pulmonary visceral metastases, any tumour markers: 86% 5- year survival

Testicular or retroperitoneal primary, no nonpulmonary visceral metastases, slightly elevated tumour markers: 92% 5-year survival

Intermediate prognosis

Any primary or tumour markers, nonpulmonary visceral metastases present (brain, liver, bone): 72% 5-year survival

Identical to good prognosis but intermediate elevation of tumour markers: 80% 5-year survival

Poor prognosis

No seminoma patients are classified as poor prognosis

Primary mediastinal tumour, or nonpulmonary visceral metastases, or high serum tumour marker concentration: 48% 5-year survival

Stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumour (NSGCT)

Malignant diseases of the                 urinary tractAbout 25 to 30% of men who apparently have stage I NSGCT will relapse during follow-up, usually in the retroperitoneum. Vascular invasion is now considered the major factor for likelihood of relapse. Other factors for relapse include embryonal carcinoma component >50% and proliferation rate >70%. Despite this, long-term survival rates approach 98 to 99%. Treatment strategies following orchidectomy for stage I disease include (1) surveillance with chemotherapy on relapse; (2) prophylactic chemotherapy given as two cycles (as opposed to three cycles on clinical relapse); and (3) primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. The decision on which treatment strategy to employ is based on patient choice, the presence or absence of the above-mentioned risk factors, and whether the patient will reliably attend follow-up. The overall survival rates are equal using all options.

Metastatic NSGCT

Good-prognosis metastatic NSGCT is treated with three cycles of BEP chemotherapy and poor-prognosis disease with four cycles. Potential complications from bleomycin include pneumonitis that is occasional fatal, but omitting bleomycin from the regimen significantly lowers long-term cure and cannot be recommended. Chemotherapy can be commenced prior to orchidectomy if presentation is with extensive metastases.

Management of a residual retroperitoneal mass

Following treatment for metastatic disease with chemotherapy, a residual mass is often left in the retroperitoneum. This may be caused by fibrosis, residual cancer, or mature differentiated teratoma, which does not respond to chemotherapy. In the setting of NSGCT a retroperitoneal lymph dissection may be offered if the mass is greater than about 1 cm in size. A residual mass following the treatment of a seminoma is often diffuse and densely adherent to the aorta and vena cava, making surgical dissection difficult, even in experienced hands, but this is still indicated if the mass is discrete, globular, and more than 3 cm in size. FDG-PET has high prognostic value in assessing the viability of seminoma (masses >3 cm) when considering such surgery.

Penile cancer

Malignant diseases of the                 urinary tractSquamous-cell cancer of the penis is a rare primary malignancy in the United Kingdom and the United States of America, but more common in Asian and South American populations. Risk factors include lack of neonatal circumcision, phimosis, smoking, infection with human papillomavirus (in particular HPV 16), and Erythroplasia of Queyrat (carcinoma in situ). Pre-malignant conditions include balanitis xerotica obliterans (BXO), cutaneous horn and HPV condyloma accuminata.

Diagnosis and staging

Penile cancer presents either as in situ carcinoma or as invasive malignancy. The former presents as a red velvety lesion and the latter as a firm mass or as ulceration. Penile squamous-cell cancer most commonly arises from the glans penis or prepuce, but may also originate on the penile shaft. Delayed presentation is common because of embarrassment or neglect.

Histological diagnosis is achieved by way of a penile incision biopsy that also provides a T stage and grade.(Fig 21.18.11)Squamous-cell cancer of the penis metastasizes in orderly fashion, without skip lesions, first to the superficial and then to the deep inguinal lymph nodes. The lymphatic drainage of the penis is bilateral and therefore laterality of the primary lesion is not relevant to the likely site of lymph node metastasis. Metastases also occur to bone and lungs.

Figure 21.18.11
T-staging of penile cancer. T, carcinoma in situ; Ta, noninvasive verrucous carcinoma; T1, tumour invades subepithelial connective tissue; T2, tumour invades corpus spongiosum or cavernosum;* T3, tumour invades urethra or prostate; T4, tumour invades other adjacent structures.

* It has been proposed that invasion into corpus cavernosum be upgraded to T3, with urethra/prostate and adjacent structures T4, as there is a difference in prognosis between corpus spongiosum and cavernosum involvement (European Society of Urology guidelines on penile cancer, 2008). From Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA (eds). (2007). Campbell-Walsh Urology, 9th edition, Volume 1, fig 31-1, p. 972. Copyright Elsevier.

Staging of penile cancer follows a TNM classification. A histological grade is also assigned. The combination of stage and grade helps to predict the risk of occult groin node metastases.

Treatment

This depends on the site, the clinical stage, and the grade of the lesion. In general the primary lesion should be treated by an adequate but relatively conservative approach, whereas the lymph nodes may require aggressive treatment if the cancer is high risk. Squamous-cell cancer in situ or superficial well-differentiated disease may be treated by penile-preserving therapies such as topical 5 fluorouracil, local excision or laser therapy. Lesions exclusively located on the prepuce may be treated with a circumcision. Larger lesions are best treated with partial penectomy (T2) or total penectomy (T3), which involves a perineal urethrostomy.

Patients refusing surgical management of the primary lesion may be treated with radiotherapy with local control rates of 60% at 5 years.

Lymphadenectomy

Penile cancer is a good example of where aggressive treatment of micrometastatic disease to local lymph nodes can result in good long-term cure rates. The difficulty lies in determining those men who have micrometastatic disease (20% of men with non-palpable nodes), with reluctance to perform a bilateral ilioinguinal lymph node dissection in everyone with penile cancer relating to the high morbidity of the procedure, including lymphoedema, flap necrosis, infection, and lymphocele formation. Novel staging strategies are being evaluated, including the use of dynamic sentinel node biopsy, FDG-PET/CT, and lymphotrophic-nanoparticle MRI scanning.

Patients with palpable lymphatic groin nodes should undergo a lymph node dissection if fine-needle aspiration confirms the presence of cancer, the differential diagnosis for such palpable nodes being infection related to the primary tumour. If there is strong suspicion that infection is the cause of lymphadenopathy, then a 6-week course of antibiotics is given, with node dissection carried out if the nodes remain palpable afterwards.

Radiotherapy is a frequently employed treatment for both the primary lesion and the groin nodes in populations with a high incidence of penile cancer, but would appear to provide inferior cancer control at 5 years compared to surgery.

Further reading

Bladder

Jung I, Messing E (2000). Molecular mechanisms and pathways in bladder cancer development and progression. Cancer Control, 7, 325–34.
Find This Resource

Khadra MH, et al. (2000). A prospective analysis of 1,930 patients with hematuria to evaluate current diagnostic practice. J Urol, 163, 524–7.
Find This Resource

Stein JP, et al. (2001). Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol, 19, 666–75.
Find This Resource

Kidney

Maher ER, et al. (1990). Clinical features and natural history of von Hippel–Lindau disease. Q J Med, 77, 1151–63.
Find This Resource

Ono Y, et al. (2005). Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: the standard of care already? Curr Opin Urol, 15, 75–8.
Find This Resource

Tsui KH, et al. (2000). Prognostic indicators for renal cell carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of 643 patients using the revised 1997 TNM staging criteria. J Urol, 163, 1090–5.
Find This Resource

Vogelzang NJ, Stadler WM (1998). Kidney cancer. Lancet, 352, 1691–6.
Find This Resource

Volpe A, et al. (2004). The natural history of incidentally detected small renal masses. Cancer, 100, 738–45.
Find This Resource

Prostate

Basch EM, et al. (2007). American Society of Clinical Oncology endorsement of the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guideline on nonhormonal therapy for men with metastatic hormone-refractory (castration-resistant) prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol, 25, 5313–18.
Find This Resource

Bill-Axelson A, et al. (2005). Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med, 352, 1977–84.
Find This Resource

Cooperberg MR, Moul JW, Carroll PR (2005). The changing face of prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol, 23, 8146–51.
Find This Resource

Di Lorenzo G, et al. (2010). Castration-resistant prostate cancer: current and emerging treatment strategies. Drugs, 70, 983–1000.
Find This Resource

Djulbegovic M, et al. (2010). Screening for prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ, 341, c4543.
Find This Resource

Kantoff PW, et al. (2010). Sipuleucel-T immunotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med, 363, 411–22.
Find This Resource

Miller DC, et al. (2003). Prostate carcinoma presentation, diagnosis, and staging: an update from the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer, 98, 1169–78.
Find This Resource

NICE (2008) Prostate cancer: diagnosis and treatment. Clinical guideline 58.http://www.nice.org.uk/Guidance/CG58/Guidance/pdf/English

Testis

De Wit R, et al. (1997). Importance of bleomycin in combination chemotherapy for good-prognosis testicular nonseminoma: a randomised study of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genitourinary Tract Cancer Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol, 15, 1837–43.
Find This Resource

Huyghe E, Matsuda T, Thonneau P (2003). Increasing incidence of testicular cancer worldwide: a review. J Urol, 170, 5–11.
Find This Resource

Kondagunta GV, Sheinfeld J, Motzer RJ (2003). Recommendations of follow-up after treatment of germ cell tumors. Semin Oncol, 30, 382–9.
Find This Resource