Discontinuing treatment of the critically ill patient
A patient may have made an advance directive before the moment of decision about life-prolonging treatments, and their view is paramount. However, many patients have not made such a directive, and in this circumstance the responsibility for such decisions remains with the doctor.
Most people agree that prolongation of life itself is not necessarily a benefit: it is only valuable if that life is of adequate quality. Continuing aggressive treatment of a patient who is severely ill may not be kind or sensible.
Depending on the clinical situation, it may be appropriate to decide not to escalate treatment, not to attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the event of circulatory arrest, or to withdraw treatment. Key points in management in such circumstances are:
Once a decision to withdraw treatment is made, then a drug or a feeding regimen can simply be stopped, and an intermittent therapy such as haemofiltration can be omitted. Terminal weaning is a protocol that allows death with dignity as mechanical ventilation is discontinued without causing distress to the patient or the family and carers.
Oxford Medicine requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.