Show Summary Details
Page of

Colonic diverticular disease 

Colonic diverticular disease
Chapter:
Colonic diverticular disease
Author(s):

S.Q. Ashraf

, M.G.W. Kettlewell

, and N.J. McC. Mortensen

DOI:
10.1093/med/9780199204854.003.1514_update_001

Update:

Management—expanded discussion of indications for surgery; emphasis on laparoscopic surgical technique, including of laparoscopic washout in selected cases; updated comments on Hartmann’s procedure.

Updated on 28 November 2012. The previous version of this content can be found here.
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD MEDICINE ONLINE (www.oxfordmedicine.com). © Oxford University Press, 2016. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Medicine Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

Subscriber: null; date: 18 August 2018

Essentials

Colonic diverticula are herniations of mucosa through the bowel musculature. They are seen most often in the sigmoid and descending colon, with a prevalence of up to 65% over the age of 80 in European populations, but they are uncommon in African and Asian countries, where the prevalence is 0.2%. A lifelong diet deficient in dietary fibre is associated with their development, but it is not known why some diverticula become symptomatic. A rise in intradiverticular pressure may play a role in perforation. Diverticula are usually discovered incidentally, but symptoms which are attributable to diverticular disease include colicky abdominal pain and bloating, often accompanied by a change in bowel habit with the passage of broken, pellety stools after considerable straining. All patients with such presentation should be investigated to exclude rectal or sigmoid carcinoma. Treatment is with reassurance that there is no serious underlying disease, a high-fibre diet, and—for patients with pain—antispasmodics such as mebeverine. Elective resection is indicated in the few patients who have repeated severe attacks.

Complications of diverticular disease include diverticultis, pericolic abscess formation, peritonitis, intestinal obstruction, haemorrhage, and fistula formation. Acute diverticulitis typically presents with pain and tenderness over the left lower abdomen, and the patient may have pyrexia, malaise, anorexia and nausea. Treatment is with rest, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and analgesia. Resection of the sigmoid colon may be necessary if symptoms fail to resolve or recur.

Epidemiology

The term diverticular disease was first described in the medical literature at the turn of the20th century. The first case of resection for a complication of diverticular disease was documented by Mayo in 1907. Autopsy studies in the United Kingdom and Australia have shown that the prevalence of colonic diverticula increases with age. It is less than 5% at the age of 40 years; at the age of 60 it is 30% and rises to 65% by the age of 85. Subtle gender differences have also been observed. In Edinburgh, 23% of all barium enemas demonstrated diverticula. The annual incidence increased from 0.17 in 1000 in those under 45 years to 5.7 in 1000 in those over 75 years of age. Women were affected more than men. A study in eastern England measured the incidence of perforation secondary to diverticular disease. They observed that there was increase in perforation with age and after adjusting for age there was a higher incidence in males (5.1 in 100 000 per year male and 3.6 in 100 000 per year female). In spite of the introduction of high-fibre diets, there is no evidence that the incidence of diverticular disease is declining. A recent review has observed a slight rise in the prevalence of perforated diverticular disease in Western countries from 2.4 in 100 000 in 1986 to 3.8 in 100 000 in 2000.

On the other hand, colonic diverticulosis is very rare in African and Asian countries where the prevalence is 0.2%. Interestingly, in a review of 600 Japanese patients with diverticular disease, right-sided colonic disease was demonstrated in 70%. This geographical distribution is not simply due to genetic factors and race, as Asian and African migrants moving to the United Kingdom or the United States of America have acquired the prevalence of disease seen in the native white population, which suggests an environmental risk factor, thought to be dietary. This is in agreement with the observation that patients presenting with complicated diverticular disease have a low intake of dietary fibre, and vegetarians have a low incidence of the disease.

Aetiology

Diverticular disease is said to be a disease of the 20th century and in the United Kingdom there is a correlation between the rising incidence at the beginning of the 20th century and an increased consumption of refined flour and sugar. Sugar consumption has trebled since 1860, and in the late 1870s the stone grinding of flour was replaced by roller milling, which removes more fibre. Modern white bread and some brown breads contain little fibre compared with the amount in wholemeal bread, which was previously a staple part of the diet.

The development of diverticula may be heavily influenced by a lifelong diet deficient in dietary fibre. A high-fibre diet is related to reduced gut transit times, with less strain on the colon. Modern, fibre-deficient diets on the other hand give rise to stiff, viscous stools that need high intracolonic pressures to propel them. High luminal pressures cause a protrusion of the mucosa through vulnerable points in the sigmoid and descending colon. These usually occur at sites where colonic blood vessels penetrate the wall. This hypothesis is supported by the observation that, although basal intracolonic pressures are similar in health and diverticular disease, when the diseased colon is activated by emotion, eating, mechanical stimuli, or drugs such as morphine or prostigmine, high pressures are generated in those segments that have diverticula. This is due to hypersegmentation by the colonic smooth muscle, and the difference has been recorded in the earliest stage of disease and may explain its progressive nature. In symptomatic patients an increase in dietary fibre causes a relief of symptoms in many cases.

Changes in the colon wall also play a part. With age, and following episodes of diverticulitis, the colonic wall becomes stiff and less distensible, aggravating the effects of raised intracolonic pressure. An increase in elastin and changes in collagen have been reported. Diabetic patients are prone to diverticular disease at an earlier stage, suggesting a defect in glycolysation of colonic collagen with advancing age. In those with connective tissue disorders such as Ehlers–Danlos syndrome or Marfan’s disease, diverticula are also seen at an unusually early age.

Pathogenesis of diverticular complications

The distinction between symptomatic and asymptomatic diverticular disease is important, for although something is known about the formation of diverticula it is not known why some diverticula become symptomatic.

A large American cohort study has shown that high red meat intake and a diet deficient in fruit and vegetables multiplied the risk of developing symptomatic diverticular disease threefold. The benefits of fibre are thought to be secondary to their effect in reducing gut transit times and colonic segmentation. Secondly, there may be a symbiotic effect related to the formation of short-chain fatty acids, which are released after bacterial action on fibre. On the other hand, certain chemicals in cooked meat such as hetrocyclic amines are thought to trigger cytotoxicity of colonocytes.

The pathogenesis of diverticular perforation is not clear. However, rises in intradiverticular pressure are thought to play a role. This may be secondary to a blockage of the mouth of a diverticulum with faecal material or colonic segmentation. Once the pressure rises over a critical threshold, focal ischaemia leading to necrosis occurs. This would then allow the passage of luminal bacteria into the local pericolic tissue. With time this would mature into a local abscess. In cases of failure of local tissue to contain the infection, there may be a progression to a faecal peritonitis. This spectrum of diverticular complications can be classified into the four stages as proposed by Hinchey (see Table 15.14.1).

Table 15.14.1 Hinchey classification of sepsis/contamination in diverticulitis

Stage

Characteristics

1

Pericolic abscess

2

Contained pelvic, retroperitoneal or distant intraperitoneal abscess

3

Generalized purulent peritonitis, no communication with bowel lumen

4

Generalized purulent peritonitis, communication with bowel lumen

The sigmoid colon, which is less compliant than other colonic segments, is where intraluminal colonic pressures are highest. This reflects the observation that the sigmoid colon is the commonest area in the colon to develop diverticular disease and also secondary complications such as perforation. It has also been noted that diverticula are very distensible and other factors are thought to play a role in whether complications such as perforation occur. Pathology reveals that diverticula consists mainly of a mucosal layer and any factor that results in changes of the integrity of the mucosal barrier will result in alteration of the ability microbial population to pass into the local tissues. This can be divided into factors affecting the microbial flora (antibiotics and fibre deficiency), mucin secretion (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and fibre), epithelial cell insult (NSAIDs) and immune activity in the colonic wall (age, drugs such as corticosteroids and immunosuppressants).

There is growing body of evidence that NSAIDs have a role to play in complicated diverticular disease. Two prospective case–control studies have shown patients with complications of diverticular disease were more likely to be taking NSAIDs than age-matched controls. Another study compared 115 cases with complicated diverticular disease with 77 with uncomplicated disease. NSAIDS and corticosteroids were found to be associated with development of peritonitis and abscess formation. Also, a large American cohort study following over 35 000 male health professional showed that individuals on NSAIDS had a relative risk of 2.2 of developing symptoms of abdominal pain, bleeding, or change in bowel habit secondary to diverticular disease. The action of NSAIDs may be secondary to a reduction in mucosal blood flow as a result of modulation of prostaglandin levels.

Pathology

A diverticulum consists of a herniation of mucosa through the colonic musculature. As it enlarges its muscular covering atrophies, so that the fully developed diverticulum consists of mucosa, connective tissue, and peritoneum. The striking abnormality is in the thickening of the circular and longitudinal muscle, which both narrows the colonic lumen and shortens the sigmoid like a concertina to give a sawtooth appearance on barium enema. The diverticula occur as slit-like apertures between the muscle clefts.

Inflammation in diverticular disease is the result of infection around diverticula, which spreads within the pericolic fat to form a dissecting abscess. Usually a single diverticulum is the cause of a pericolic abscess, perhaps initiated by the presence of a faecolith. Involvement of the peritoneum results in local peritonitis, which may become generalized in the event of a perforation. This may also give rise to intraabdominal abscesses or fistulas to the bladder, small bowel, vagina, or uterus. Repeated episodes of diverticulitis lead to a contracted, narrowed sigmoid colon surrounded by fibrous tissue. Bleeding in diverticular disease can often be traced to an infected diverticulum. This may cause either the erosion of a vessel in its wall or the formation of granulation tissue inside the diverticulum, which then bleeds.

Clinical features

Only 10 to 15% of cases of diverticular disease result in symptoms, of which 75% develop diverticultis. They are usually discovered incidentally. The symptoms usually result from disordered motility rather than secondary complications of the disease.

Uncomplicated diverticular disease

Symptoms which are attributable to diverticular disease include colicky abdominal pain and bloating. Pain can be felt along the course of the colon, particularly over the sigmoid, and is often accompanied by a change in bowel habit with the passage of broken, pellety stools after considerable straining. Examination may reveal some tenderness over the sigmoid colon without guarding or evidence of systemic upset. These symptoms may be indistinguishable from those of the irritable bowel syndrome. The passage of blood with an unformed stool needs to be investigated thoroughly to exclude more sinister pathology.

Management

All patients should have a CT colonography or flexible sigmoidoscopy to exclude a rectal or sigmoid carcinoma (Fig. 15.14.1). Once diagnosed, patients should be reassured that there is no serious underlying disease and a high-fibre diet should be recommended. Exercise and high dietary fibre have been shown to be prevent the development of diverticular disease in prospective studies. However, evidence for the efficacy of dietary fibre for treatment of established diverticular disease is not conclusive, as shown by two randomized controlled trials where only one showed improved symptoms. Current dietary recommendations include wholemeal bread, wholewheat breakfast cereals, rough porridge or muesli, and fresh fruit and vegetables daily. Fibre increases stool bulk in three ways—by holding water, by proliferation of bacteria, and from the by-products of bacterial fermentation. The coarser the fibre the greater is the faecal bulk, but also the greater the unpalatability. Although cooking bran improves its taste, it reduces its water-holding capacity. A good clinical response is usually achieved by including two tablespoons of bran with the morning cereal, but about one-half of patients will experience gaseous distension or cramps on starting the high-fibre diet. It is worth warning them that this is likely to happen and that it will resolve within a month or so if they persist with the diet.

Fig. 15.14.1 Barium enema showing a narrowed sigmoid colon with a few diverticula. This appearance can be confused with those of a carcinoma and colonoscopy would be indicated to clarify the diagnosis.

Fig. 15.14.1
Barium enema showing a narrowed sigmoid colon with a few diverticula. This appearance can be confused with those of a carcinoma and colonoscopy would be indicated to clarify the diagnosis.

More recent studies looking at pharmacological agents have shown some benefit with rifamaxin (a derivative of rifamycin) and fibre. Mesalazine has also been associated with a decreased recurrence of symptoms over placebo. However this study also showed that abdominal pain was more common in the treatment group. A case–control study has shown that mesalazine is associated with reduced intracolonic pressure and a reduction in the perforation rate. A reduction in perforation rate was also observed with the use of calcium channel blockers. This is thought to act via the mechanism of reducing intracolonic pressure. Long term use of opioids may be detrimental in such patients, resulting in an increased the risk of developing perforation.

In patients with pain, antispasmodics such as mebeverine may be useful, and in a minority with repeated severe attacks an elective laparoscopic resection is then indicated (Table 15.14.2). This is probably more effective than sigmoid myotomy, an operation that became popular in the mid-1960s. In this procedure the circular muscle is divided with a longitudinal incision to widen the colonic lumen. The incision is made through the taenia so as to avoid opening diverticula, and is deepened until the mucosa is just seen. The operation lowers the sigmoid intraluminal pressures and improves symptoms but, after 3 years, pressures return to their former levels. The need for myotomy has declined and the procedure is now rarely performed.

Table 15.14.2 Indications for surgery

Sepsis

  • Recurrent diverticulitis

  • Perforated diverticulitis

  • Purulent peritonitis

  • Faecal peritonitis

  • Pelvic or paracolic abscess

Colonic obstruction

  • Inflammatory stricture

  • Fibrotic stricture

  • Suspected malignancy

Fistulae

  • Colovesical

  • Colovaginal

  • Ileocolic

  • Major haemorrhage

Complicated diverticular disease

Complications of diverticular disease include diverticultis, percolic abscess formation, peritonitis, intestinal obstruction, haemorrhage, and fistula formation. This results in the significant morbidity and mortality in this subgroup of patients. This has obvious cost implications in terms of expenditure in health services across the Western world. It is important to distinguish the minority of patients who suffer from a febrile attack with left iliac fossa peritonism, sometimes called left-sided appendicitis, from those with chronic pain and diarrhoea. The inflammation may settle with minimal symptoms or develop into a pericolic abscess or peritonitis.

Acute diverticulitis

Pain is felt over the left lower abdomen, and the patient may have pyrexia, malaise, anorexia, and nausea which evidence of systemic upset. The neutrophil count is raised. This is as a result of localized bacterial infection in the colonic wall causing an inflammatory infiltrate thus resulting in systemic manifestations. In certain cases, right iliac fossa tenderness may be present due to sigmoid colon looping to the right side of the abdomen. This may be diagnosed at laparoscopy for right iliac pain.

Treatment is with rest, antibiotics, usually coamoxiclav 1.2 g and metronidazole 500 mg 8-hourly (effective against Gram-negative bacteria and anaerobes), and analgesia. Most cases settle within a few days and the diagnosis can be confirmed after 6 to 8 weeks with imaging or endoscopy. A narrow segment can sometimes be difficult to distinguish from a carcinoma and any doubtful cases can be clarified by subsequent careful colonoscopy (Fig. 15.14.2).

Fig. 15.14.2 The typical appearance of diverticula seen at colonoscopy. Note the muscular haustra and the mouths of diverticula—one with a faecolith.

Fig. 15.14.2
The typical appearance of diverticula seen at colonoscopy. Note the muscular haustra and the mouths of diverticula—one with a faecolith.

(From the Slide atlas of gastroenterology, Gower Medical Publishing, London, with permission.)

If symptoms fail to resolve, or recur, laparoscopic resection of the sigmoid colon may be necessary. When it is necessary to resect an acutely inflamed and unprepared colon, a Hartmann’s operation may be safer than a sigmoid coectomy as the former avoids an anastomosis.

Colonic diverticular diseaseHowever, complications will normally develop during the primary episode with further episodes having less inflammatory sequelae. Risk of recurrence after the first episode ranges from 7 to 60%. For recurrent diverticulitis operated electively, a primary anastomosis would be ideal. The accepted management policy for recurrent diverticulitis is elective surgery after two episodes of uncomplicated diverticulitis in order to reduce the morbidity and mortality risk associated with admission for complicated diverticulitis. It would also be reasonable to discuss surgery in a patient under the age of 50 presenting with severe, complicated diverticulitis for the first time. However this needs to be tempered by the observation from a population-based study that only 25% of patients with perforated diverticulitis actually had a previous history of diverticular disease. This is in agreement with other studies which puts the range at 3 to 30%. Furthermore following elective operation, 10% develop recurrent diverticulitis. Patients being consented for elective operations therefore need to be fully informed of the potential risks and benefits.

Diverticular abscess

Acute diverticulitis can lead to a local peritonitis with abscess formation, either in the paracolic or pelvic area. There may be a palpable mass and a swinging fever. When in doubt the diagnosis should be confirmed by spiral CT scanning with rectal contrast (Fig. 15.14.3). The latter investigation is excellent at demonstrating bowel wall thickening, abscess formation, and extraluminal disease. The specificity is high (over 97%). The size of the abscess can be measured. Small abscesses less than 5 cm in size can be treated with antibiotics with good outcome. Those less than 2 cm in size can be treated with antibiotics in the community.

Fig. 15.14.3 CT of the pelvis in a patient with acute diverticulitis. The sigmoid colon is grossly thickened, the lumen narrowed, and pockets of air are seen in the diverticular disease.

Fig. 15.14.3
CT of the pelvis in a patient with acute diverticulitis. The sigmoid colon is grossly thickened, the lumen narrowed, and pockets of air are seen in the diverticular disease.

It is wise to let an abscess localize whilst treating the patient with rest, antibiotics, and analgesia. Some abscesses will be amenable to drainage by direct incision, either over them or via the rectum or vagina. More complicated collections are best drained by CT-guided aspiration or drain placement. There is rarely any need to do a proximal transverse colostomy. If drainage persists, an elective laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy with primary anastomosis can be done at a later date. Even when an abscess is localized, there is a risk of rupture into the peritoneal cavity with subsequent generalized peritonitis.

Perforated diverticulitis

Acute diverticulitis can be complicated by generalized purulent peritonitis, either by direct spread from the inflamed colon or by rupture of a peridiverticular abscess. Purulent peritonitis carries a mortality of around 15%. The clinical picture is of severe intraperitoneal sepsis with toxaemia, ileus, and abdominal pain, and septicaemia will often follow. Before surgery such patients need to be intensively resuscitated with intravenous colloids together with administration of systemic antibiotics. Once stabilized, they require emergency laparotomy.

Other causes of the acute abdomen that may not require surgery should be excluded, including pelvic inflammatory disease, ureteric calculus, and even pulmonary embolus. In these circumstances spiral CT scanning is invaluable.

Colonic diverticular diseaseSurgical options include laparoscopic lavage with drainage, defunctioning transverse loop colostomy, Hartmann’s procedure—removing the diseased sigmoid, oversewing the distal rectum, and bringing out an end colostomy—or colonic resection and primary anastomosis. Laparoscopic washout has been shown to be an effective option in selected cases where there is no evidence of widrspread peritoneal contamination. Defunctioning stomas are associated with complications of ongoing sepsis secondary to residual faecal material that is still present within the septic colon. Historically, complicated diverticular disease was managed in three stages in which initially the sepsis was drained together with the formation of transverse loop colostomy. This was then followed by resection of the diseased segment and end colostomy followed by reversal. However, this required three hospital admissions and resulted in considerable morbidity. The reduction to a two-stage (Hartmann’s) procedure resulted in a drop in mortality rates. More recent studies suggest that in a selected case group a one-stage process involving primary anastomosis is not associated with increased mortality rates. This has the added advantages of reducing hospital re-admissions, although there is a risk of potential leak. There has been a shift away from the more conservative procedures in this situation due to the residual ‘septic colon’ and the further problem of the unsuspected carcinoma within the inflammatory mass. For these reasons experienced colorectal surgeons tend to perform colonic resections. Hartmann’s operation is the procedure most frequently used (Fig. 15.14.4).

Fig. 15.14.4 (a) The area of sigmoid colon resected for perforated diverticular disease. (b) Hartmann’s operation—the sigmoid colon has been resected, the rectum oversewn, and a left iliac fossa colostomy fashioned.

Fig. 15.14.4
(a) The area of sigmoid colon resected for perforated diverticular disease. (b) Hartmann’s operation—the sigmoid colon has been resected, the rectum oversewn, and a left iliac fossa colostomy fashioned.

Colonic diverticular diseaseHartmann’s procedure is safe and effective and removes the postoperative risk of anastomotic leak, although subsequent reconnection involves a major operation in older patients. A significant proportion of patients (up to 40%) do not undergo reversal, thus adding weight to the argument for the one-stage procedure in selected cases.

Faecal peritonitis

This is a catastrophic complication with a mortality approaching 50%, in patients over the age of 80. A diverticulum ruptures, often with little or no inflammation, liberating quantities of faeces into the peritoneal cavity. Rapid and severe shock with septicaemia ensues. Energetic resuscitation is necessary, followed promptly by surgery and a Hartmann’s operation. These patients often need to be stabilized in an intensive care unit postoperatively.

Intestinal obstruction

Recurrent inflammation with fibrosis and muscular hypertrophy can lead to progressive stenosis and colonic obstruction, which is usually chronic but may present acutely. Conservative treatment is worth trying at first, provided a carcinoma has been excluded. With the aid of a stool softener the symptoms may resolve and the stricture gradually dilate. If these measures fail, the bowel should be prepared for a laparoscopic segmental colonic resection, with care taken not to aggravate the obstruction.

Small-bowel obstruction is sometimes a complication of acute diverticulitis, as the bowel may adhere to the inflammatory mass. It usually resolves as the inflammation subsides but on occasion surgery is required for division of adhesions or even a small-bowel resection.

Colonic fistulas

A colovesical fistula usually presents with recurrent urinary tract infections, together with pneumaturia or faecuria. The fistula arises in the sigmoid, which has often folded over into the pouch of Douglas, and adheres to the apex of the bladder. This is the most frequent cause of colovesical fistula but carcinoma and Crohn’s disease should be excluded.

Fistulas may also occur between the sigmoid and vagina, uterus, ureter, and ileum. They seldom heal spontaneously but do not always give rise to disabling symptoms and so represent a relative indication for surgery. Sigmoid colectomy as a one-stage procedure is the best option, and colostomy is rarely required. A fistula into the bladder is simply closed and urethral catheter drainage continued for a week.

Haemorrhage

Major haemorrhage is an uncommon but well-recognized complication. Bleeding from the colon only accounts for 20% of gastrointestinal haemorrhages, of which 50% are diverticular in origin. It is important that other more common causes for bleeding such as polyps and angiodysplasia are excluded by angiographic studies and colonoscopy. Most patients who present tend to be elderly. Massive bleeding is defined when over 40% of blood volume is lost. This can be catastrophic in older patients who have a reduced physiological capacity to maintain vital organ perfusions.

Massive bleeds tend to present as fresh rectal bleeding. Up to 80% will settle down spontaneously and require only transfusion and supportive measures. The initial management of these patients includes oxygen therapy with adequate venous access. Disorders of coagulation need to be identified and corrected during the ongoing resuscitation process. It is important to exclude upper gastrointestinal bleeding by way of endoscopy. Colonoscopy in the immediate aftermath of a bleed can be difficult but in experienced hands the diagnostic yield can be high as 70%. The endoscope needs to have a wide-bore suction channel and excessive insufflation needs to be avoided due to the risk of causing a re-bleed. In units with access to vascular services, mesenteric angiography can be performed. An on-going minimum bleeding rate of 1 to 1.5 mL/min is required to accurately localize the lesion. Therapeutic interventions that are available include vasopressin injection and selective embolization. Radiolabelling is usually reserved for patients who are haemodynamically stable, with no access to vascular radiology and failure to establish a diagnosis during endoscopy. However, in circumstances where there is accelerated transit if blood, localization can be poor. As the haemorrhage can be from any part of the colon, good localization is an essential prelude to any operation. Blind colonic resections have a particularly poor record and if the site of bleeding has still not been located, on-table colonic lavage via the appendix stump and intraoperative colonoscopy will usually target the bleeding segment.

A study published in the New England Journal of Medicine reported the results of urgent colonoscopy in bleeding diverticular disease. Instead of the traditional conservative measures patients were given bowel preparation and colonoscoped within 12 h. Bleeding sites thus identified were treated by colonoscopic diathermy and the number of major bleeds, blood transfusions, and operations was reduced together with length of hospital stay. It remains to be seen whether this will result in a major shift of emphasis in management. However, the main objective in these patients should be proper monitoring and prompt investigation after admission with colonic bleeding.

Further reading

Biondo S, et al. (2002). Acute colonic diverticulitis in patients under 50 years of age. Br J Surg, 89, 1137–41.Find this resource:

Boulos BP, et al. (1984). Is colonoscopy necessary in diverticular disease? Lancet, i, 95–6.Find this resource:

Brodribb AJ (1977). Treatment of symptomatic diverticular disease with a high fibre diet. Lancet, i, 644–66.Find this resource:

    Campbell K, Steele RJ (1991). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and complicated diverticular disease: a case-control study. Br J Surg, 78, 190–1.Find this resource:

    Eastwood MA, et al. (1977). Variation in the incidence of diverticular disease within the city of Edinburgh. Gut, 18, 571–4.Find this resource:

    Eastwood MA, et al. (1978). Comparison of bran, ispaghula and lactulose on colon function in diverticular disease. Gut, 19, 1144–7.Find this resource:

    Gear JSS, et al. (1979). Symptomless diverticular disease and intake of dietary fibre. Lancet, i, 511–14.Find this resource:

    Gianfranco JA, Abcarian H (1982). Pitfalls in the treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding with blind subtotal colectomy. Dis Colon Rect, 25, 441–5.Find this resource:

    Grief JM, Fried DO, McSherry CK (1980). Surgical treatment of perforated diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon. Dis Colon Rect, 23, 483–7.Find this resource:

    Heaton KW (1985). Diet and diverticulosis—new leads. Gut, 26, 541–3.Find this resource:

    Hughes LE (1969). Postmortem survey of diverticular disease of the colon. Gut, 10, 336–51.Find this resource:

    Hyland JMP, Taylor I (1980). Does a high fibre diet prevent the complications of diverticular disease? Br J Surg, 67, 77–9.Find this resource:

    Janes SEJ, Meagher A, Frizelle FA (2006). Management of diverticulitis. BMJ, 332, 271–5.Find this resource:

    Jensen DM, et al. (2000). Urgent colonoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of severe diverticular haemorrhage. N Engl J Med, 342, 78–82.Find this resource:

    Kettlewell MGW, Moloney GE (1977). Combined horizontal and longitudinal colomyotomy for diverticular disease: preliminary report. Dis Colon Rect, 20, 24–8.Find this resource:

    Krukowski ZH, Mattheson NA (1985). Emergency surgery for diverticular disease complicated by generalised and faecal peritonitis: a review. Br J Surg, 71, 921–7.Find this resource:

    Krukowski ZH, Koruth NM, Mattheson NA (1985). Evolving practice in acute diverticulitis. Br J Surg, 72, 684–6.Find this resource:

    Jones OM, et al. (2008). Laparoscopic resection for diverticular disease: follow-up of 500 consecutive patients. Ann Surg, 248, 1092–7.Find this resource:

    Morris CR, et al. (2002). Epidemiology of perforated colonic diverticular disease. Postgrad Med J, 78, 654–9.Find this resource:

    Myers E, et al. (2008). Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for generalised peritonitis due to perforated diverticulitis. Br J Surg, 95, 97–101.Find this resource:

    Ornstein MH, et al. (1981). Are fibre supplements really necessary in diverticular disease of the colon? A controlled clinical trial. BMJ, 282, 1353–6.Find this resource:

    Painter NS (1975). Diverticular disease of the colon. Heinemann Medical, London.Find this resource:

      Papi C, et al. (1995). Efficacy of rifaximin in the treatment of symptomatic diverticular disease of the colon: a multi-centre double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 9, 33–9.Find this resource:

      Reilly M (1966). Sigmoid myotomy. Br J Surg, 53, 859–63.Find this resource:

      Smith AN, et al. (1969). Clinical and manometric results one year after sigmoid myotomy for diverticular disease. Br J Surg, 56, 895–9.Find this resource:

      Whiteway J, Morson BC (1985). Elastosis in diverticular disease of the sigmoid colon. Gut, 26, 258–66.Find this resource:

      Wilson RG, Smith AN, Macintyre IM (1990). Complications of diverticular disease and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a prospective study. Br J Surg, 77, 1103–4.Find this resource: