Show Summary Details
Page of

Using evidence to guide practice in health protection 

Using evidence to guide practice in health protection
Using evidence to guide practice in health protection

Merav Kliner

, Ewan Wilkinson

, and Sam Ghebrehewet

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD MEDICINE ONLINE ( © Oxford University Press, 2016. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Medicine Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 20 June 2018

This chapter describes the importance of evidence-based decisions in health protection practice. It describes the hierarchy of evidence, from systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials to case reports and opinion. The chapter emphasizes the importance of assessing methodological quality, the quality of the evidence, and the risks of different types of bias. For policy to be as robust as possible it should be based on the best available evidence, and much evidence is useful even when it isn’t used in policy. Therefore, in this chapter, tools are described for reaching evidence-based recommendations, including the Evidence to Decision Framework. Factors that may influence policy development are reviewed, including social and political pressures that may impede evidence-based policy. Finally, the chapter considers critical appraisal of policy using the AGREE II tool.

Access to the complete content on Oxford Medicine Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.