Show Summary Details
Page of

The metaphor of mental illness 

The metaphor of mental illness
Chapter:
The metaphor of mental illness
Author(s):

Neil Pickering

DOI:
10.1093/med/9780198530886.003.0006
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD MEDICINE ONLINE (www.oxfordmedicine.com). © Oxford University Press, 2016. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Medicine Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 17 November 2018

The different possible ways of thinking of the phenomena around us are marked out in part by our categories, classifications, and kinds. These categories are made up of the religious, social, moral, and political and of the scientific, mechanical, and causal. We take the kinds of interests represented by these categories in such matters as madness, and make it in the image of those interests. In the case of psychiatry, what makes it a scientific endeavour and what makes mental illness an object of that endeavour, is that psychiatry makes mental illness in non-social categories.

This position is, I believe, consistent with what is right in the strong programme in the sociology of knowledge. That is to say, it is consistent with what that programme can plausibly show, if not consistent with what it actually claims. It claims to show that political, economic, moral ideas are reproduced in scientific and other disciplines (including philosophy). But when we look carefully at the nature of this reproduction we see that it does not get as far as breaking down the distinction between the scientific and the social. There continues to be a case for a dualism. This dualism is perhaps less between the product of nature and the product of the social (the dualism of Latour's modern), and more between scientific resources and materials and social resources and materials. I would base my claim not to be a sceptic on the foundation of a dualism of this sort.

So, in the end, as I understand it, the strong programme is not a threat to my position. I can happily concur with what it can plausibly claim about the role of the social, while not being logically committed to anything more sceptical.

Access to the complete content on Oxford Medicine Online requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.